Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36231399›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Comparison of US and EU Prices for Orphan Drugs in the Perspective of the Considered US Orphan Drugs Act Modifications and Discussed Price-Regulation Mechanisms Adjustments in US and European Union.

Paweł Żelewski, Michał Wojna, Katarzyna Sygit, Elżbieta Cipora, Izabela Gąska, Mateusz Niemiec, Mateusz Kaczmarski, Tomasz Banaś, Beata Karakiewicz, Artur Kotwas and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Paweł ŻelewskiDepartment of Economics, Kozminsky University, 03-301 Warsaw, Poland.
Michał WojnaDepartment of Economics, Kozminsky University, 03-301 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3869-3215
Katarzyna SygitFaculty of Health Sciences, Calisia University, 62-800 Kalisz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7173-2266
Elżbieta CiporaMedical Institute, Jan Grodek State University in Sanok, 38-500 Sanok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7794-550X
Izabela GąskaMedical Institute, Jan Grodek State University in Sanok, 38-500 Sanok, Poland.
Mateusz NiemiecMedical Institute, Jan Grodek State University in Sanok, 38-500 Sanok, Poland.
Mateusz KaczmarskiMedical Institute, Jan Grodek State University in Sanok, 38-500 Sanok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4498-7110
Tomasz BanaśDepartment of Gynaecology and Oncology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-501 Cracow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6656-2490
Beata KarakiewiczSubdepartment of Social Medicine and Public Health, Department of Social Medicine, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6527-7287
Artur KotwasSubdepartment of Social Medicine and Public Health, Department of Social Medicine, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6805-4713
Paulina ZabielskaSubdepartment of Social Medicine and Public Health, Department of Social Medicine, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8377-7218
Olga PartykaDepartment of Health Economics and Medical Law, Medical University of Warsaw, Żwirk i Wigury 81 St., 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6359-2902
Monika PajewskaDepartment of Economic and System Analyses, National Institute of Public Health-NIH-National Research Institute, 00-791 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7735-5219
Edyta Krzych-FałtaDepartment of Basic of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Warsaw, 01-445 Warsaw, Poland.
Ewa BandurskaCenter for Competence Development, Integrated Care and e-Health, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-204 Gdansk, Poland.
Weronika CiećkoCenter for Competence Development, Integrated Care and e-Health, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-204 Gdansk, Poland.
Aleksandra CzerwDepartment of Health Economics and Medical Law, Medical University of Warsaw, Żwirk i Wigury 81 St., 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6189-6678

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2019 worldwide sales of Orphan Drugs were estimated at $136 billion USD, which constituted 16% of the global pharmaceutical prescription market and is expected to grow by 12% in the next 5 years. A better understanding of Orphan Drug pricing may contribute to on-going discussions on Orphan Drug Act (ODA) corrections in US or modifications of price setting mechanisms in EU. The objective of the study was comparison and analysis of the prices of Orphan Drugs in US and EU. All drugs with Orphan Drug status were compared in the US and EU. For the US prices, the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) was sourced. The EU List Prices came from six EU countries: Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Poland, Spain. We found US prices to be higher than the six selected EU countries. The average Price Ratio was 1.64. The prices across EU countries were more homogeneous, while the number of the reimbursed and therefore available to patient medicines varied and was correlated with GDP per capita r = 0.87. Considered implementation of the External Reference Price system in US may generate significant savings in the US but may result in upward pressure on pricing of Orphan Drugs in EU. Centralization of the Orphan Drugs pricing negotiations in EU may prevent such development and offer a win-win opportunity for all involved parties.

Indexed as

Orphan Drug ProductionCosts and Cost AnalysisEuropean UnionHumansUnited Stateseconomyorphan drugspharmacologyprice

Identifiers

PMID36231399
PMCPMC9566473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.