Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36231345›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Predictors of the Quality of Life of University Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Enrique Ramón-Arbués, Emmanuel Echániz-Serrano, Blanca Martínez-Abadía, Isabel Antón-Solanas, Ana Cobos-Rincón, Iván Santolalla-Arnedo, Raúl Juárez-Vela, Benjamin Adam Jerue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Investigating the Impact of Night Eating Disorder Upon Quality of Life Among University College Students, India.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Enrique Ramón-ArbuésFaculty of Health Sciences, Campus Universitario Villanueva de Gállego, Universidad San Jorge, 50830 Saragossa, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7911-9949
Emmanuel Echániz-SerranoH27_20D Transfercult, Investigation Group, Aragón, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Blanca Martínez-AbadíaOccupational Health and Prevention Service of the Zaragoza City Council, 50003 Saragossa, Spain.
Isabel Antón-SolanasFaculty of Health Sciences, Zaragoza University, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8206-4803
Ana Cobos-RincónGRUPAC, Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of La Rioja, 26004 Logroño, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4121-8992
Iván Santolalla-ArnedoGRUPAC, Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of La Rioja, 26004 Logroño, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6705-7122
Raúl Juárez-VelaGRUPAC, Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of La Rioja, 26004 Logroño, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3597-2048
Benjamin Adam JerueFaculty of Communication and Social Sciences, Campus Universitario Villanueva de Gállego, Universidad San Jorge, 50830 Saragossa, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quality of life (QOL) is a complex and multifaceted concept that has been used to study different aspects of people's lives, including physical and psychological wellbeing, financial independence, social relationships, personal beliefs and living situation. In this study, we aimed to assess the QOL of a group of Spanish university students and identify associated factors.

methodWe completed a cross-sectional study of the QOL of 868 university students using the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire. In addition, data regarding sociodemographic information and self-esteem (Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale), physical activity (International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short version), diet (Spanish Index of Healthy Eating), alcohol consumption (CAGE questionnaire) and sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index) were collected.

resultsA total of 66.2% of participants assessed their QOL positively, while 58.8% favorably evaluated their overall health. Students reported the highest scores for the physical health domain of QOL, whereas they gave the lowest scores for the psychological health domain. Age was inversely associated with QOL. Higher self-esteem and satisfaction with academic performance, as well as sleep and diet quality, were directly associated with higher QOL. The physical health domain of QOL was scored more highly by participants who had a healthy body weight or those who reported moderate levels of physical activity. Higher scores in the social relationships domain of QOL were directly linked to alcohol intake, smoking and low body weight in addition to being inversely associated with screen time. The psychological domain of QOL was lower for those who were overweight or lived alone.

conclusionMany sociodemographic, academic and behavioral variables are associated with university students' QOL. The present findings underscore the need to direct further initiatives toward identifying and overcoming barriers to increased QOL for university students.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeStudentsBody WeightCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiescross-sectional studiesquality of lifeuniversitiesWHOQOL-BREFyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID36231345
PMCPMC9564890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.