Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36231317›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Believing Processes during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Analysis.

Jolana Wagner-Skacel, Sophie Tietz, Eva Fleischmann, Frederike T Fellendorf, Susanne A Bengesser, Melanie Lenger, Eva Z Reininghaus, Marco Mairinger, Christof Körner, Christoph Pieh and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jolana Wagner-SkacelDepartment of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Medical University Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.
Sophie TietzClinical Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Medical University Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.
Eva FleischmannClinical Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Medical University Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.
Frederike T FellendorfClinical Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Medical University Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7215-3848
Susanne A BengesserClinical Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Medical University Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.
Melanie LengerClinical Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Medical University Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.
Eva Z ReininghausClinical Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Medical University Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5964-4087
Marco MairingerClinical Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Medical University Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9564-8835
Christof KörnerDepartment of Psychology, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Christoph PiehDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Continuous Education Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2708-303X
Rüdiger J SeitzDepartment of Neurology, Centre of Neurology and Neuropsychiatry, Medical Faculty, LVR-Klinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, 40625 Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1168-9187
Hannes HickInstitute of Machine Components and Methods of Development, University of Technology Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Hans-Ferdinand AngelDepartment of Catechetics and Religious Education, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-3994-2092
Nina DalknerClinical Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Medical University Graz, 8036 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7716-3674

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognition, emotion, emotional regulation, and believing play a special role in psychosocial functioning, especially in times of crisis. So far, little is known about the process of believing during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to examine the process of believing (using the Model of Credition) and the associated psychosocial strain/stress during the first lockdown in the COVID-19 pandemic. An online survey via LimeSurvey was conducted using the Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and a dedicated Believing Questionnaire, which assesses four parameters of credition (propositions, certainty, emotion, mightiness) between April and June, 2020, in Austria. In total,

Indexed as

COVID-19CognitionCommunicable Disease ControlEmotionsHumansPandemicscognitionCOVID-19creditionemotionpsychosocial functioning

Identifiers

PMID36231317
PMCPMC9565181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.