Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36231237›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

ECG Standards and Formats for Interoperability between mHealth and Healthcare Information Systems: A Scoping Review.

Daniel Cuevas-González, Juan Pablo García-Vázquez, Miguel Bravo-Zanoguera, Roberto López-Avitia, Marco A Reyna, Nestor Alexander Zermeño-Campos, María Luisa González-Ramírez

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Biometric contrastive learning for data-efficient deep learning from electrocardiographic images.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  7. Advances in IoMT for Healthcare Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel Cuevas-GonzálezFacultad de Ingeniería, MyDCI, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexicali 21100, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-4225-0927
Juan Pablo García-VázquezFacultad de Ingeniería, MyDCI, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexicali 21100, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-1787-7223
Miguel Bravo-ZanogueraFacultad de Ingeniería, MyDCI, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexicali 21100, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-1227-9726
Roberto López-AvitiaFacultad de Ingeniería, MyDCI, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexicali 21100, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-3615-6560
Marco A ReynaFacultad de Ingeniería, MyDCI, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexicali 21100, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-9954-2958
Nestor Alexander Zermeño-CamposFacultad de Ingeniería, MyDCI, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexicali 21100, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-4638-4682
María Luisa González-RamírezFacultad de Ingeniería, MyDCI, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexicali 21100, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-1397-4758

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interoperability is defined as the ability of a system or device to communicate between different technologies and software applications. This allows the exchange and use of data in an efficient, precise, and robust way. The present article gives researchers and healthcare information systems developers a qualitative and quantitative synthesis of the state of knowledge related to data formats and data standards proposed for mHealth devices interoperability in healthcare information systems that retrieve and store ECG data. We carry out a scoping review to answer to following questions: (1) What digital data formats or data standards have been proposed for the interoperability of electrocardiograph data between traditional healthcare information systems and mobile healthcare information systems? (2) What are the advantages and disadvantages of these data formats or data standards? The scoping review was conducted in four databases in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews, and in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A total of 4018 studies were identified of which 30 studies met the inclusion criteria. Based on our findings, we identify four standards and nine formats for capturing and storing streaming ECG data in mobile health applications. The standards used were HL7, SCP-ECG, x73-PHD, and PDF/A. Formats include CSV, PDF-ECG, and seven XML-based formats. These are ECG-XML, HL7-XML, mPCG-XML, mECGML, JSON, SaECG, and CDA R2.

Indexed as

Health Information SystemsTelemedicineElectrocardiographySoftwareECGEKGhealthcare information systemsinteroperabilitymobile health systemsstandards

Identifiers

PMID36231237
PMCPMC9565220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.