Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36231235›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

An Evidence-Based Somatic Acupressure Intervention Protocol for Managing the Breast Cancer Fatigue-Sleep Disturbance-Depression Symptom Cluster: Development and Validation following the Medical Research Council Framework.

Jing-Yu Benjamin Tan, Tao Wang, Isabella Zhao, Mary Janice Polotan, Sabina Eliseeva

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of self-acupressure on the fatigue-sleep disturbance-depression symptom cluster in breast cancer survivors: a phase III randomised controlled trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jing-Yu Benjamin TanCollege of Nursing and Midwifery, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, NT 0810, Australia.
Tao WangCollege of Nursing and Midwifery, Charles Darwin University, Brisbane Centre, 410 Ann Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9845-3988
Isabella ZhaoCollege of Nursing and Midwifery, Charles Darwin University, Brisbane Centre, 410 Ann Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.
Mary Janice PolotanCollege of Nursing and Midwifery, Charles Darwin University, Brisbane Centre, 410 Ann Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.
Sabina EliseevaCollege of Nursing and Midwifery, Charles Darwin University, Brisbane Centre, 410 Ann Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.
Charles Darwin University · AUQueensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSomatic acupoint stimulation (SAS) has been frequently utilised as a promising intervention for individual cancer-related symptom management, such as fatigue, sleep disturbance and depression. However, research evidence regarding the role of SAS in mitigating the fatigue-sleep disturbance-depression symptom cluster (FSDSC) has been scant. This study was conducted to develop an evidence-based SAS intervention protocol that can be further implemented in a Phase II randomized controlled trial (RCT) to manage the FSDSC in breast cancer survivors.

methodsThe Medical Research Council Framework for Developing and Evaluating Complex Intervention (MRC framework) was employed to guide the development procedures of the SAS intervention protocol, including the identification of an existing evidence base, the identification of theories and practice standards, and the validation of the SAS intervention protocol. A content validity study was performed through an expert panel to assess the scientific and practical appropriateness of the SAS intervention protocol. The content validity index (CVI), including item-level CVI and protocol-level CVI, were calculated to evaluate the consensus level of the expert panel.

resultsKey components of the SAS protocol, including the acupoint formula, the SAS modality, technique, intensity and frequency were identified for both a true and placebo SAS intervention based on the best available research evidence retrieved from systematic reviews, clinical trials, and relevant theories, particularly regarding the inflammatory process,

conclusionsA research-informed, theory-driven and practically feasible SAS intervention protocol for the FSDSC management in breast cancer survivors was developed following the MRC framework. The feasibility and acceptability of the SAS intervention will be further tested in breast cancer survivors through a Phase II RCT.

Indexed as

AcupressureBiomedical ResearchBreast NeoplasmsSleep Wake DisordersClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicDepressionFatigueFemaleHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSleepSyndromeacupressurebreast cancercontent validitydepressionfatiguesleep disturbance

Identifiers

PMID36231235
PMCPMC9565572
OpenAlexW4296626566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.