Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36231146›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Mercury Exposure among Populations and Environments in Contact with Electronic Waste.

Gwen Aubrac, Ashley Bastiansz, Niladri Basu

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Arsenic, mercury, manganese, and lead exposure in Mexican adults aged 50 and older.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. A Review of the Role of Curcumin in Metal Induced Toxicity.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gwen AubracBieler School of Environment, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2A7, Canada.
Ashley BastianszFaculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC H9X 3V9, Canada.
Niladri BasuFaculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC H9X 3V9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2695-1037

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic waste (e-waste) recycling releases mercury (Hg) into the environment, though to our knowledge Hg levels at such sites have yet to be examined on a worldwide basis. A systematic review of scientific studies was conducted to extract, analyze, and synthesize data on Hg levels in e-waste products, environments near recycling sites, and in people. Data were extracted from 78 studies from 20 countries, and these included Hg levels in 1103 electrical and electronic products, 2072 environmental samples (soil, air, plant, food, water, dust), and 2330 human biomarkers (blood, hair, urine). The average Hg level in products was 0.65 μg/g, with the highest levels found in lamps (578 μg/g). Average soil and sediment Hg levels (1.86 μg/g) at e-waste sites were at least eight times higher than at control sites. Average urinary Hg levels (0.93 μg/g creatinine) were approximately two-fold higher among e-waste workers versus control groups. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that e-waste recycling may lead to Hg contamination in environments and human populations in close proximity to processing sites. These findings contribute to a growing knowledge base of mercury exposure through diverse source-exposure pathways, and the work has potential policy implications in the context of the Minamata Convention.

Indexed as

Electronic WasteMercuryBiomarkersCreatinineDustEnvironmental MonitoringHumansSoilWaste ProductsWater Pollutants, ChemicalBiomarkersCreatinineDustMercurySoilWaste ProductsWater Pollutants, Chemicalelectronic wastemercurymetalsoccupational healthreview

Identifiers

PMID36231146
PMCPMC9564538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.