Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36230883›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Advances in Preclinical/Clinical Glioblastoma Treatment: Can Nanoparticles Be of Help?

Daniel Ruiz-Molina, Xiaoman Mao, Paula Alfonso-Triguero, Julia Lorenzo, Jordi Bruna, Victor J Yuste, Ana Paula Candiota, Fernando Novio

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Advancements in Drug Delivery Systems in Glioblastoma Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Betulinic acid and obesity-related disorders.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Glioblastoma Therapy: Past, Present and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daniel Ruiz-MolinaCatalan Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (ICN2), CSIC and BIST, Campus UAB, Bellaterra, 08193 Barcelona, Spain.
Xiaoman MaoCatalan Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (ICN2), CSIC and BIST, Campus UAB, Bellaterra, 08193 Barcelona, Spain.
Paula Alfonso-TrigueroCatalan Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (ICN2), CSIC and BIST, Campus UAB, Bellaterra, 08193 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6554-5656
Julia LorenzoInstitut de Biotecnologia i de Biomedicina, Departament de Bioquimica i Biologia Molecular, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5659-6008
Jordi BrunaNeuro-Oncology Unit, Bellvitge University Hospital-ICO (IDIBELL), Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet, 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6895-5047
Victor J YusteInstituto de Neurociencias. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Campus UAB, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5322-9261
Ana Paula CandiotaInstitut de Biotecnologia i de Biomedicina, Departament de Bioquimica i Biologia Molecular, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1523-6505
Fernando NovioCatalan Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (ICN2), CSIC and BIST, Campus UAB, Bellaterra, 08193 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1517-3612

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion RTI2018-098027-B-C21, RTI2018-098027-B-C22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GB) is the most aggressive and frequent primary malignant tumor in the central nervous system (CNS), with unsatisfactory and challenging treatment nowadays. Current standard of care includes surgical resection followed by chemotherapy and radiotherapy. However, these treatments do not much improve the overall survival of GB patients, which is still below two years (the 5-year survival rate is below 7%). Despite various approaches having been followed to increase the release of anticancer drugs into the brain, few of them demonstrated a significant success, as the blood brain barrier (BBB) still restricts its uptake, thus limiting the therapeutic options. Therefore, enormous efforts are being devoted to the development of novel nanomedicines with the ability to cross the BBB and specifically target the cancer cells. In this context, the use of nanoparticles represents a promising non-invasive route, allowing to evade BBB and reducing systemic concentration of drugs and, hence, side effects. In this review, we revise with a critical view the different families of nanoparticles and approaches followed so far with this aim.

Indexed as

BBBbrain cancerdrug deliveryglioblastomananoparticlespreclinical model

Identifiers

PMID36230883
PMCPMC9563739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.