Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36230811›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Defining A Liquid Biopsy Profile of Circulating Tumor Cells and Oncosomes in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer for Clinical Utility.

Sachin Narayan, George Courcoubetis, Jeremy Mason, Amin Naghdloo, Drahomír Kolenčík, Scott D Patterson, Peter Kuhn, Stephanie N Shishido

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sachin NarayanMichelson Center for Convergent Bioscience, Convergent Science Institute in Cancer, Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0787-1349
George CourcoubetisMichelson Center for Convergent Bioscience, Convergent Science Institute in Cancer, Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8622-6251
Jeremy MasonMichelson Center for Convergent Bioscience, Convergent Science Institute in Cancer, Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5933-5003
Amin NaghdlooMichelson Center for Convergent Bioscience, Convergent Science Institute in Cancer, Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Drahomír KolenčíkBiomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, 32300 Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Scott D PattersonGilead Sciences, Inc., Lakeside Drive, Foster City, CA 94404, USA.
Peter KuhnMichelson Center for Convergent Bioscience, Convergent Science Institute in Cancer, Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2629-4505
Stephanie N ShishidoMichelson Center for Convergent Bioscience, Convergent Science Institute in Cancer, Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
University of Southern California · USCharles University · CZGilead Sciences (United States) · US

Funding

Gilead Sciences (United States) GS-US-296-0101Susan Pekarovics Private SupportUSC Michelson Center Convergent Science Institute in Cancer InstitutionalVassiliadis Research Fund Private SupportVicky Jospeh Research Fund Private Support
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is characterized by its extensive disease heterogeneity, suggesting that individualized analysis could be vital to improving patient outcomes. As a minimally invasive approach, the liquid biopsy has the potential to longitudinally monitor heterogeneous analytes. Current platforms primarily utilize enrichment-based approaches for epithelial-derived circulating tumor cells (CTC), but this subtype is infrequent in the peripheral blood (PB) of mCRC patients, leading to the liquid biopsy's relative disuse in this cancer type. In this study, we evaluated 18 PB samples from 10 mCRC patients using the unbiased high-definition single-cell assay (HDSCA). We first employed a rare-event (Landscape) immunofluorescence (IF) protocol, which captured a heterogenous CTC and oncosome population, the likes of which was not observed across 50 normal donor (ND) samples. Subsequent analysis was conducted using a colorectal-targeted IF protocol to assess the frequency of CDX2-expressing CTCs and oncosomes. A multi-assay clustering analysis isolated morphologically distinct subtypes across the two IF stains, demonstrating the value of applying an unbiased single-cell approach to multiple assays in tandem. Rare-event enumerations at a single timepoint and the variation of these events over time correlated with progression-free survival. This study supports the clinical utility of an unbiased approach to interrogating the liquid biopsy in mCRC, representing the heterogeneity within the CTC classification and warranting the further molecular characterization of the rare-event analytes with clinical promise.

Indexed as

circulating tumor cellscolorectal cancerheterogeneityhigh-definition single-cell assayliquid biopsymulti-assayoncosomesrare cell

Identifiers

PMID36230811
PMCPMC9563925
OpenAlexW4303621820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.