ArticleCancers2022
Differences and Similarities in the Pattern of Early Metabolic and Morphologic Response after Induction Chemo-Immunotherapy versus Induction Chemotherapy Alone in Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Head and Neck Cancer.
Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- SBRT embedded in low-dose RT plus αPD-1 (immuno-EclipseRT, iERT) elicits CD8Nature communications · 2026Article
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In head and neck cancer patients, parameters of metabolic and morphologic response of the tumor to single-cycle induction chemotherapy (IC) with docetaxel, cis- or carboplatin are used to decide the further course of treatment. This study investigated the effect of adding a double immune checkpoint blockade (DICB) of tremelimumab and durvalumab to IC on imaging parameters and their significance with regard to tumor cell remission. Methods: Response variables of 53 patients treated with IC+DICB (ICIT) were compared with those of 104 who received IC alone. Three weeks after one cycle, pathologic and, in some cases, clinical and endoscopic primary tumor responses were evaluated and correlated with a change in 18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI-based maximum-standardized uptake values (SUVmax) before (SUVmaxpre), after treatment (SUVmaxpost) and residually (resSUVmax in % of SUVmaxpre), and in maximum tumor diameter (Dmax) before (Dmaxpre) and after treatment (Dmaxpost) and residually (resD). Results: Reduction of SUVmax and Dmax occurred in both groups; values were SUVmaxpre: 14.4, SUVmaxpost: 6.6, Dmaxpre: 30 mm and Dmaxpost: 23 mm for ICIT versus SUVmaxpre: 16.5, SUVmaxpost: 6.4, Dmaxpre: 21 mm, and Dmaxpost: 16 mm for IC alone (all p < 0.05). ResSUVmax was the best predictor of complete response (IC: AUC: 0.77; ICIT: AUC: 0.76). Metabolic responders with resSUVmax ≤ 40% tended to have a higher rate of CR to ICIT (88%; n = 15/17) than to IC (65%; n = 30/46; p = 0.11). Of the metabolic nonresponders (resSUVmax > 80%), 33% (n = 5/15) achieved a clinical CR to ICIT versus 6% (n = 1/15) to IC (p = 0.01). Conclusions: ICIT and IC quickly induce a response and 18F-FDG PET is the more accurate modality for identifying complete remission. The rate of discrepant response, i.e., pCR with metabolic nonresponse after ICIT was >30%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.