Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36230625›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Automated Assessment of Breast Positioning Quality in Screening Mammography.

Mouna Brahim, Kai Westerkamp, Louisa Hempel, Reiner Lehmann, Dirk Hempel, Patrick Philipp

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mouna BrahimFraunhofer Institute of Optronics, System Technologies and Image Exploitation IOSB, Fraunhofer Center for Machine Learning, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3829-0862
Kai WesterkampFraunhofer Institute of Optronics, System Technologies and Image Exploitation IOSB, Fraunhofer Center for Machine Learning, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Louisa HempelMedical School, Sigmund Freud University, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Reiner LehmannDontBePatient Intelligence GmbH, 20095 Hamburg, Germany.
Dirk HempelInstitute of Translational Molecular Tumor Research, 85354 Freising, Germany.
Patrick PhilippFraunhofer Institute of Optronics, System Technologies and Image Exploitation IOSB, Fraunhofer Center for Machine Learning, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7968-9757
Fraunhofer Institute of Optronics, System Technologies and Image Exploitation · DESigmund Freud Privatuniversität Wien · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Screening mammography is a widely used approach for early breast cancer detection, effectively increasing the survival rate of affected patients. According to the Food and Drug Administration's Mammography Quality Standards Act and Program statistics, approximately 39 million mammography procedures are performed in the United States each year. Therefore, breast cancer screening is among the most common radiological tasks. Interpretation of screening mammograms by a specialist radiologist includes primarily the review of breast positioning quality, which is a key factor affecting the sensitivity of mammography and thus the diagnostic performance. Each mammogram with inadequate positioning may lead to a missed cancer or, in case of false positive signal interpretation, to follow-up activities, increased emotional burden and potential over-therapy and must be repeated, requiring the return of the patient. In this study, we have developed deep convolutional neuronal networks to differentiate mammograms with inadequate breast positioning from the adequate ones. The aim of the proposed automated positioning quality evaluation is to assist radiology technologists in detecting poorly positioned mammograms during patient visits, improve mammography performance, and decrease the recall rate. The implemented models have achieved 96.5% accuracy in cranio-caudal view classification and 93.3% accuracy in mediolateral oblique view regarding breast positioning quality. In addition to these results, we developed a software module that allows the study to be applied in practice by presenting the implemented model predictions and informing the technologist about the missing quality criteria.

Indexed as

breast cancerconvolutional neuronal networkscranio-codaldecision supportdeep learningmammogrammediolateral obliquepositioning qualitytrustworthy AI

Identifiers

PMID36230625
PMCPMC9562663
OpenAlexW4297348435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.