Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36230619›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

FOXA1 in Breast Cancer: A Luminal Marker with Promising Prognostic and Predictive Impact.

Jasna Metovic, Fulvio Borella, Marta D'Alonzo, Nicoletta Biglia, Luca Mangherini, Cristian Tampieri, Luca Bertero, Paola Cassoni, Isabella Castellano

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Oncology research · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jasna MetovicDepartment of Oncology, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9146-1747
Fulvio BorellaDivision of Gynecology and Obstetrics 1, City of Health and Science University Hospital, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8398-7557
Marta D'AlonzoAcademic Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, University of Turin, 10128 Turin, Italy.
Nicoletta BigliaAcademic Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano, University of Turin, 10128 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1009-5309
Luca MangheriniDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Cristian TampieriDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6515-7338
Luca BerteroDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9887-7668
Paola CassoniDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1977-7410
Isabella CastellanoDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.
University of Turin · ITA. O. Ordine Mauriziano di Torino · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present review focuses on the function of the forkhead protein FOXA1 in breast cancer (BC) in relation to steroid hormone receptors. We explored the currently available analytic approaches for FOXA1 assessment both at gene and protein levels, comparing the differences between the available techniques used for its diagnostic assessment. In addition, we elaborated on data regarding the prognostic and predictive role of this marker in BC based on several studies that evaluated its expression in relation to the outcome and/or response to therapy. FOXA1, similar to the androgen receptor (AR), may have a dual role in BC according to hormonal status. In luminal cancers, its expression contributes to a better prognosis, while in triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC), it implies an adverse outcome. Consequently, we observed that FOXA1-positive expression in a neoadjuvant setting may predict a lack of response in luminal BC as opposed to TNBC, in which FOXA1 allegedly increases its chemosensitivity. In conclusion, considering its accessible and convenient identification by immunohistochemistry, its important impact on prognosis, and its suitability to identify patients with different responses to chemotherapy, we propose that FOXA1 could be tested in routine diagnostics as an additional prognostic and predictive marker in BC.

Indexed as

androgen receptorbreast cancerestrogen receptorFOXA1predictive markerprognostic marker

Identifiers

PMID36230619
PMCPMC9564251
OpenAlexW4297348361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.