Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36230613›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Identification and Validation of a Novel Ferroptotic Prognostic Genes-Based Signature of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Zhiyuan Shi, Jianzhong Zheng, Qing Liang, Yankuo Liu, Yi Yang, Rui Wang, Mingshan Wang, Qian Zhang, Zuodong Xuan, Huimin Sun and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhiyuan ShiDepartment of Urology, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361101, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9935-5631
Jianzhong ZhengDepartment of Urology, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361101, China.
Qing LiangFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ and Tissue Regeneration, Organ Transplantation Institute of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361101, China.
Yankuo LiuDepartment of Urology, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361101, China.
Yi YangDepartment of Urology, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361101, China.
Rui WangFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ and Tissue Regeneration, Organ Transplantation Institute of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361101, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7501-1869
Mingshan WangDepartment of Urology, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361101, China.
Qian ZhangFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ and Tissue Regeneration, Organ Transplantation Institute of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361101, China.
Zuodong XuanDepartment of Urology, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361101, China.
Huimin SunCentral Laboratory, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361101, China.
Kejia WangFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ and Tissue Regeneration, Organ Transplantation Institute of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361101, China.
Chen ShaoDepartment of Urology, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361101, China.
Xiamen University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81972373the Scientific Research Foundation for Advanced Talents of Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University PM201809170001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as one of the primary urological malignant neoplasms, shows poor survival, and the leading pathological type of RCC is clear cell RCC (ccRCC). Differing from other cell deaths (such as apoptosis, necroptosis, pyroptosis, and autophagy), ferroptosis is characterized by iron-dependence, polyunsaturated fatty acid oxidization, and lipid peroxide accumulation. We analyzed the ferroptosis database (FerrDb V2), Gene Expression Omnibus database, The Cancer Genome Atlas database, and the ArrayExpress database. Nine genes that were differentially expressed and related to prognosis were involved in the ferroptotic prognostic model via the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression analysis, which was established in ccRCC patients from the kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC) cohort in TCGA database, and validated in ccRCC patients from the E-MTAB-1980 cohort in the ArrayExpress database. The signature could be an independent prognostic factor for ccRCC, and high-risk patients showed worse overall survival. The Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes were utilized to investigate the potential mechanisms. The nine genes in ccRCC cells with erastin or RSL3 treatment were validated to find the crucial gene. The glutaminase 2 (GLS2) gene was upregulated during ferroptosis in ccRCC cells, and cells with GLS2 shRNA displayed lower survival, a lower glutathione level, and a high lipid peroxide level, which illustrated that GLS2 might be a ferroptotic suppressor in ccRCC.

Indexed as

clear cell renal cell carcinomaE-MTAB-1980ferroptosisGLS2prognostic modelTCGA

Identifiers

PMID36230613
PMCPMC9562262
OpenAlexW4297348464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.