Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36230590›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

A Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model of Epidermal Growth Factor Mutations in Lung Adenocarcinomas.

Ruimin He, Xiaohua Yang, Tengxiang Li, Yaolin He, Xiaoxue Xie, Qilei Chen, Zijian Zhang, Tingting Cheng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A predictive nomogram forJournal of thoracic disease · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ruimin HeSchool of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China.
Xiaohua YangSchool of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2977-1787
Tengxiang LiSchool of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China.
Yaolin HeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang 421001, China.
Xiaoxue XieDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha 410013, China.
Qilei ChenDepartment of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA 01854, USA.
Zijian ZhangXiangya Lung Cancer Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2702-8025
Tingting ChengXiangya Lung Cancer Center, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China.
University of South China · CNCentral South University · CNHunan Cancer Hospital · CNUniversity of Massachusetts Lowell · US

Funding

China Medical Education Association 2020 major scientific problems and medical technology problems 2020KTS010Clinical medical technology innovation guidance project of Hunan Province 2020SK53706Science Foundation of Hunan Province 2021JJ70151Science Foundation of Hunan Province 2022JJ70072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data from 758 patients with lung adenocarcinoma were retrospectively collected. All patients had undergone computed tomography imaging and EGFR gene testing. Radiomic features were extracted using the medical imaging tool 3D-Slicer and were combined with the clinical features to build a machine learning prediction model. The high-dimensional feature set was screened for optimal feature subsets using principal component analysis (PCA) and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). Model prediction of EGFR mutation status in the validation group was evaluated using multiple classifiers. We showed that six clinical features and 622 radiomic features were initially collected. Thirty-one radiomic features with non-zero correlation coefficients were obtained by LASSO regression, and 24 features correlated with label values were obtained by PCA. The shared radiomic features determined by these two methods were selected and combined with the clinical features of the respective patient to form a subset of features related to EGFR mutations. The full dataset was partitioned into training and test sets at a ratio of 7:3 using 10-fold cross-validation. The area under the curve (AUC) of the four classifiers with cross-validations was: (1) K-nearest neighbor (AUCmean = 0.83, Acc = 81%); (2) random forest (AUCmean = 0.91, Acc = 83%); (3) LGBM (AUCmean = 0.94, Acc = 88%); and (4) support vector machine (AUCmean = 0.79, Acc = 83%). In summary, the subset of radiographic and clinical features selected by feature engineering effectively predicted the EGFR mutation status of this NSCLC patient cohort.

Indexed as

epidermal growth factorlung adenocarcinomamachine learningradiomics

Identifiers

PMID36230590
PMCPMC9563411
OpenAlexW4297148172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.