ReviewCancers2022
Modern Management Options for Ph+ ALL.
Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06175702 (Treatment Protocol for Newky Diagnosed Adult Ph-Chromosome Positive), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Treatment Protocol for Newky Diagnosed Adult Ph-Chromosome Positive (BCR::ABL1) Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (LALPh2022)
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- From fatal disease to functional cure: 25 years of tyrosine kinase inhibition in chronic myeloid leukemia.Leukemia · 2026Review
- Long-term outcomes of co-administration of CD19 and CD22 CAR-T cell therapy in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- [Recent advances in the diagnosis and management of Ph(+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia with multilineage involvement].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2025Review
- Dasatinib-resistant universal CAR-T cells proliferate in the presence of host immune cells and exhibit antitumor activity.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Article
- Ponalfil trial for adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Long-term results.HemaSphere · 2024Article
- How to Manage Philadelphia-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Resource-Constrained Settings.Cancers · 2023Review
- Article
- Oral Manifestations: A Warning-Sign in Children with Hematological Disease Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia.Hematology reports · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Impressive advances have been achieved in the management of patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) since the initial concurrent use of imatinib and standard chemotherapy. The attenuation of chemotherapy has proven to be equally effective and less toxic, the use of third generation TKI upfront has improved the frequency of complete molecular response and the survival rate, and the combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors with immunotherapy has further increased the rate of molecular response to 70-80% after consolidation, which has been translated into a survival rate of 75-90% in recent trials. As a result of these improvements, the role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is being redefined. The methodology of measurable residual disease assessment and the detection of ABL1 mutations are also improving and will contribute to a more precise selection of the treatment for newly diagnosed and relapsed or refractory (R/R) patients. Finally, new compounds combined with immunotherapeutic approaches, including cellular therapy, are being used as rescue therapy and will hopefully be included in first line therapy in the near future. This article will review and update the modern management of patients with Ph+ ALL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.