ArticleCancers2022
Clinical Testing for Mismatch Repair in Neoplasms Using Multiple Laboratory Methods.
Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeting O6-methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase Deficiency in Preclinical Models of Extracranial Human Cancers with a Tumor-Selective DNA-Modifying Agent.Molecular cancer therapeutics · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Algorithm for the Detection of Tumor Microsatellite Instability Based on Multiomics Biomarkers.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2026Article
- Certain pMMR colorectal cancer patients should undergo additional MSI-PCR testing to reduce the risk of misdiagnosing MSI-H and Lynch syndrome.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Immunohistochemistry in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: histological subtyping and drug selection.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Genomic Alterations in DNA Mismatch Repair Genes Across Different Cancer Types.JCO precision oncology · 2024Article
- Real-world study on microsatellite instability and mismatch repair deficiency testing patterns among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in Spain.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024Observational
- IntragenicCancers · 2023Article
- Low incidence of microsatellite instability in gastric cancers and its association with the clinicopathological characteristics: a comparative study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Testing for deficient mismatch repair and microsatellite instability : A focused update.Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- [Testing deficient mismatch repair and microsatellite instability : A focused update. German version].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- DNA Damage Repair Pathways in Prostate Cancer: A Narrative Review of Molecular Mechanisms, Emerging Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets in Precision Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- DNA Mismatch Repair System Imbalances in Breast Adenocarcinoma.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: A deficiency in DNA mismatch repair function in neoplasms can be assessed by an immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of the deficiency/loss of the mismatch repair proteins (dMMR) or by PCR-based methods to assess high microsatellite instability (MSI-H). In some cases, however, there is a discrepancy between the IHC and MSI analyses. Several studies have addressed the issue of discrepancy between IHC and MSI deficiency assessment, but there are limited studies that also incorporate genetic/epigenetic alterations. Methods: In this single-institution retrospective chart-review study, we reviewed 706 neoplasms assessed between 2015 and 2021. All eligible neoplasms were assessed by IHC testing, MSI analysis by PCR-based assay, and tumor-normal paired next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis. Eighty percent of neoplasms with MLH1 protein loss had a concurrent MLH1 promoter methylation analysis. Mutation data for MMR genes, IHC, MSI analysis, and tumor histology were correlated with each other. Results: Fifty-eight (8.2%) of 706 neoplasms had MSI-H by PCR and/or dMMR by IHC. Of the 706 analyzed neoplasms, 688 neoplasms (98%) had concordant results: MSI-H/dMMR (n = 44), microsatellite-stable (MSS)/proficient MMR (pMMR) (n = 625), and MSI-Low (L)/pMMR (n = 19). Of the remaining 18 neoplasms, 9 had a major discordance: MSS/loss of MSH2 and MSH6 (n = 3), MSS/loss of MSH6 (n = 2), MSS/Loss of MLH1 and PMS2 (n = 1), and MSI-High/pMMR (n = 3). In total, 57% of cases with dMMR and 61% of cases with MSI-H had a null mutation of an MMR gene mutation (or methylation of the MLH1 promoter), whereas this figure was 1% for neoplasms with a normal IHC or MSI pattern (p < 0.001). Among 9 cases with major discordance between MSI and IHC, only 3 cases (33%) had an underlying genetic/epigenetic etiology, whereas 37 (76%) of 49 cases with MSI-H and/or dMMR and without major discordance had an underlying genetic abnormality (p = 0.02). Discussion: For most neoplasms, IHC and PCR-based MSI testing results are concordant. In addition, an underlying genetic abnormality (a null mutation of an MMR gene or MLH1 promoter methylation) was attributable to dMMR and/or MSI-H findings. For neoplasms with major discordance in IHC and MSI testing, the addition and integration of NGS results and MLH1 promoter methylation analyses can be beneficial for resolving borderline cases, thereby facilitating patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.