Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36230374›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Effect of Dietary Rumen-Degradable Starch to Rumen-Degradable Protein Ratio on In Vitro Rumen Fermentation Characteristics and Microbial Protein Synthesis.

Panliang Chen, Yan Li, Yizhao Shen, Yufeng Cao, Qiufeng Li, Meimei Wang, Mingchao Liu, Zhiyuan Wang, Zihan Huo, Shuai Ren and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Potential of seaweed (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  9. Effect of Replacing Corn Meal with Winged Bean Tuber (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Panliang ChenCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4350-7541
Yan LiKey Laboratory of Healthy Breeding in Dairy Cattle (Co-Construction by Ministry and Province), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China.
Yizhao ShenCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1678-7808
Yufeng CaoCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China.
Qiufeng LiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China.
Meimei WangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China.
Mingchao LiuKey Laboratory of Healthy Breeding in Dairy Cattle (Co-Construction by Ministry and Province), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China.
Zhiyuan WangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China.
Zihan HuoCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China.
Shuai RenCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China.
Yanxia GaoCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9436-693X
Jianguo LiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China.
Hebei Agricultural University · CN

Funding

Earmarked fund CARS36Hebei Dairy Cattle Innovation Team of Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System HBCT2018120203Key Research and Development Project of Hebei 20326606DPrecision Animal Husbandry Discipline Group Construction Project of Hebei Agricultural Uni-versity 1090064Top Talent Project of Hebei Province 6012018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of dietary rumen-degradable starch (RDS, g/kg of DM) to rumen-degradable protein (RDP, g/kg of DM) ratios (SPR) on in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics and microbial protein synthesis (MCPS). Treatments were eight diets with SPR of 1.9, 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6 and were formulated to be isoenergetic, isonitrogenous, and isostarch. Substrates were anaerobically incubated in sealed culture vials (100 mL) for 6, 24 or 48 h. Three incubation runs were conducted within two consecutive weeks. With the increase of the dietary SPR, the gas production (GP), in vitro dry matter disappearance (IVDMD) and concentration of MCPS and total volatile fatty acids (TVFA) linearly increased after 6 h of incubation (p ≤ 0.01), whereas they quadratically increased and peaked at the SPR of 2.3 after 24 and 48 h of incubation (p < 0.05). In response to dietary SPR increasing, the in vitro neutral detergent fiber disappearance (IVNDFD) quadratically increased (p < 0.01), and the ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) concentration linearly decreased (p < 0.01) after 6, 24 and 48 h of incubation. Based on the presented results, an SPR of 2.3 is recommended for formulating a diet due to its greatest IVDMD, IVNDFD, GP, TVFA and MCPS. However, as the results obtained are strictly dependent on the in vitro conditions, further in vivo studies are needed to verify our findings.

Indexed as

in vitromicrobial protein synthesisrumen-degradable proteinrumen-degradable starchrumen fermentation

Identifiers

PMID36230374
PMCPMC9559263
OpenAlexW4303579238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.