Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36230281›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

A "Good Life" for Dairy Cattle: Developing and Piloting a Framework for Assessing Positive Welfare Opportunities Based on Scientific Evidence and Farmer Expertise.

Jessica E Stokes, Elizabeth Rowe, Siobhan Mullan, Joy C Pritchard, Rachel Horler, Marie J Haskell, Cathy M Dwyer, David C J Main

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jessica E StokesSchool of Agriculture, Food and Environment, Royal Agricultural University, Cirencester GL7 6JS, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8933-2981
Elizabeth RoweFarm Animal Welfare, School of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK.
Siobhan MullanUCD Veterinary Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.
Joy C PritchardFarm Animal Welfare, School of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK.
Rachel HorlerMaundrils Farm, West Huntspill, Highbridge TA9 8QS, UK.
Marie J HaskellAnimal Behaviour & Welfare, Animal & Veterinary Sciences, Scottish Rural University College, Edinburgh EH25 9RG, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9373-0624
Cathy M DwyerAnimal Behaviour & Welfare, Animal & Veterinary Sciences, Scottish Rural University College, Edinburgh EH25 9RG, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7511-2056
David C J MainSchool of Agriculture, Food and Environment, Royal Agricultural University, Cirencester GL7 6JS, UK.

Funding

Scottish Government CR/2015/12XL Vets N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

On-farm welfare assessment tends to focus on minimising negative welfare, but providing positive welfare is important in order to give animals a good life. This study developed a positive welfare framework for dairy cows based on the existing scientific literature which has focused on developing positive welfare indicators, and trialled a participatory approach with farmers; refining the framework based on their recommendations, followed by a vet pilot phase on farm. The results revealed that farmers and scientists agree on what constitutes "a good life" for dairy cattle. Farmers value positive welfare because they value their cows' quality of life, and want to be proud of their work, improve their own wellbeing as well as receive business benefits. For each good life resource, the proportion of farmers going above and beyond legislation ranged from 27 to 84%. Furthermore, barriers to achieving positive welfare opportunities, including monetary and time costs, were not apparently insurmountable if implementation costs were remunerated (by the government). However, the intrinsic value in providing such opportunities also incentivises farmers. Overall, most farmers appeared to support positive welfare assessment, with the largest proportion (50%) supporting its use within existing farm assurance schemes, or to justify national and global marketing claims. Collaborating with farmers to co-create policy is crucial to showcase and quantify the UK's high welfare standards, and to maximise engagement, relevance and uptake of animal welfare policy, to ensure continuous improvement and leadership in the quality of lives for farm animals.

Indexed as

animal welfareanimal welfare assessmentanimal welfare policydairy cattlefarmer wellbeingpositive welfarequality of life

Identifiers

PMID36230281
PMCPMC9559654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.