Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36230277›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Cryopreservation of

Aidan L Huene, Jack C Koch, Lucía Arregui, Yue Liu, Matthew L Nicotra, Virginia M Weis, Terrence R Tiersch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aidan L HueneDepartment of Surgery, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Jack C KochAquatic Germplasm and Genetic Resources Center, School of Renewable Natural Resources, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70820, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5733-4640
Lucía ArreguiAquatic Germplasm and Genetic Resources Center, School of Renewable Natural Resources, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70820, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4355-0155
Yue LiuAquatic Germplasm and Genetic Resources Center, School of Renewable Natural Resources, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70820, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3838-8277
Matthew L NicotraDepartment of Surgery, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Virginia M WeisDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1826-2848
Terrence R TierschAquatic Germplasm and Genetic Resources Center, School of Renewable Natural Resources, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70820, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7738-1978

Funding

Safeguarding Genetic Resources of Aquatic Biomedical Models - Research SupplementalR24OD028443 · OD · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV AGRICULTURAL CENTER · PI Jack Koch, Yue Liu · 2020 to 2026
$5.4M
Enhanced Development of the Xiphophorus Model System R24-OD-011120R24OD011120 · OD · TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WALTER, RONALD B · 2012 to 2019
$5.3M
Development of Germplasm Resources for Preservation of Aquatic ModelsR24OD010441 · OD · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV AGRICULTURAL CENTER · PI BLACKBURN, HARVEY D., MONROE, WILLIAM · 2012 to 2021
$4.3M
Interdisciplinary Training in Transplantation BiologyT32AI074490 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Angus W Thomson · 2007 to 2026
$4.2M
National Science Foundation 192325NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI074490NIH HHS R24 OD010441NIH HHS R24-OD010441NIH HHS R24-OD011120NIH HHS R24 OD028443NIH HHS R24-OD028443NIH HHS T32AI074490
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus is an emerging model organism in which cutting-edge genomic tools and resources are being developed for use in a growing number of research fields. One limitation of this model system is the lack of long-term storage for genetic resources. The goal of this study was to establish a generalizable cryopreservation approach for Hydractinia that would support future repository development for other cnidarian species. Specific objectives were to: (1) characterize basic parameters related to sperm quality; (2) develop a generalizable approach for sperm collection; (3) assess the feasibility of in vitro fertilization (IVF) with sperm after refrigerated storage; (4) assess the feasibility of IVF with sperm cryopreserved with various sperm concentrations; (5) evaluate feasibility of cryopreservation with various freezing conditions, and (6) explore the feasibility of cryopreservation by use of a 3-D printed open-hardware (CryoKit) device. Animal husbandry and sperm collection were facilitated by use of 3-D printed open hardware. Hydractinia sperm at a concentration of 2 × 107 cells/mL stored at 4 °C for 6 d were able to achieve 50% fertilization rate. It appeared that relatively higher sperm concentration (>5 × 107 cells/mL) for cryopreservation could promote fertilization. A fertilization rate of 41−69% was observed using sperm equilibrated with 5, 10, or 15% (v/v) cryoprotectant (dimethyl sulfoxide or methanol) for 20 min, cooled at a rate of 5, 10, or 20 °C/min from 4 °C to −80 °C, at a cell concentration of 108/mL, in 0.25 mL French straws. Samples cryopreserved with the CryoKit produced a fertilization rate of 72−82%. Establishing repository capabilities for the Hydractinia research community will be essential for future development, maintenance, protection, and distribution of genetic resources. More broadly, these generalizable approaches can be used as a model to develop germplasm repositories for other cnidarian species.

Indexed as

3-D printingcnidariafertilizationgermplasm repositoryHydractinialarvaeopen hardwaresperm cryopreservation

Identifiers

PMID36230277
PMCPMC9559378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.