Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36230189›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Evaluation of Nano-Wall Material for Production of Novel Lyophilized-Probiotic Product.

Zin Myo Swe, Thapakorn Chumphon, Marutpong Panya, Kanjana Pangjit, Saran Promsai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zin Myo SweBioproduct Science Program, Department of Science, Faculty of Liberal Arts and Science, Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-3140-9565
Thapakorn ChumphonBioproduct Science Program, Department of Science, Faculty of Liberal Arts and Science, Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand.
Marutpong PanyaCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Ubon Ratchathani University, Ubon Ratchathani 34190, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-5262-573X
Kanjana PangjitCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Ubon Ratchathani University, Ubon Ratchathani 34190, Thailand.
Saran PromsaiBioproduct Science Program, Department of Science, Faculty of Liberal Arts and Science, Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-9259-7809
Kasetsart University · THUbon Ratchathani University · TH

Funding

National Research Council of Thailand NRCT5-RGJ63002 (Sub-Code NRCT-RGJ63012-143)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lyophilization is one of the most used methods for bacterial preservation. In this process, the cryoprotectant not only largely decreases cellular damage but also plays an important part in the conservation of viability during freeze-drying. This study investigated using cryoprotectant and a mixture of the cryoprotectant to maintain probiotic activity. Seven probiotic strains were considered: (

Indexed as

cryoprotectantfreeze-dryinggum arabicprebioticprobioticsynbiotic

Identifiers

PMID36230189
PMCPMC9564142
OpenAlexW4303644760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.