Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36230169›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Postbiotics: Current Trends in Food and Pharmaceutical Industry.

Priyamvada Thorakkattu, Anandu Chandra Khanashyam, Kartik Shah, Karthik Sajith Babu, Anjaly Shanker Mundanat, Aiswariya Deliephan, Gitanjali S Deokar, Chalat Santivarangkna, Nilesh Prakash Nirmal

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 171 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
171citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
42.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

171 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 320 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Effects of Heat-KilledNutrients · 2023
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Postbiotic metabolites fromExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

111 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Priyamvada ThorakkattuDepartment of Animal Sciences and Industry, Food Science Institute, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Anandu Chandra KhanashyamDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Kartik ShahSargento Foods, 305 Pine Street, Elkhart Lake, WI 53020, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7826-3105
Karthik Sajith BabuDepartment of Animal Sciences and Industry, Food Science Institute, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8924-1884
Anjaly Shanker MundanatDepartment of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, National Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Management (NIFTEM), Sonipat 131028, India.
Aiswariya DeliephanKraft Heinz R&D Center, 801 Waukegan Rd, Glenview, IL 60025, USA.
Gitanjali S DeokarDepartment of Quality Assurance, MET's Institute of Pharmacy, Bhujbal Knowledge City, Nashik 422003, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8490-5960
Chalat SantivarangknaInstitute of Nutrition, Mahidol University, 999 Phutthamonthon 4 Road, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-4458-1938
Nilesh Prakash NirmalInstitute of Nutrition, Mahidol University, 999 Phutthamonthon 4 Road, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-2732-4534
Kansas State University · USMahidol University · THKasetsart University · THKraft Heinz (United States) · USNational Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Management · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postbiotics are non-viable bacterial products or metabolic byproducts produced by probiotic microorganisms that have biologic activity in the host. Postbiotics are functional bioactive compounds, generated in a matrix during anaerobic fermentation of organic nutrients like prebiotics, for the generation of energy in the form of adenosine triphosphate. The byproducts of this metabolic sequence are called postbiotics, these are low molecular weight soluble compounds either secreted by live microflora or released after microbial cell lysis. A few examples of widely studied postbiotics are short-chain fatty acids, microbial cell fragments, extracellular polysaccharides, cell lysates, teichoic acid, vitamins, etc. Presently, prebiotics and probiotics are the products on the market; however, postbiotics are also gaining a great deal of attention. The numerous health advantages of postbiotic components may soon lead to an increase in consumer demand for postbiotic supplements. The most recent research aspects of postbiotics in the food and pharmaceutical industries are included in this review. The review encompasses a brief introduction, classification, production technologies, characterization, biological activities, and potential applications of postbiotics.

Indexed as

bioactivityfunctional foodshealth-promotinglactic acid bacteriametabolitespostbiotics

Identifiers

PMID36230169
PMCPMC9564201
OpenAlexW4303644892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.