Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36230153›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Microbial Properties of Raw Milk throughout the Year and Their Relationships to Quality Parameters.

Huizhi Yuan, Sufang Han, Shufei Zhang, Yuling Xue, Yaoguang Zhang, Han Lu, Shijie Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Synthetic toehold biosensors for detectingFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Molecular identification ofJournal of veterinary research · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Huizhi YuanCollege of Food Science and Biology, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang 050018, China.
Sufang HanCollege of Food Science and Biology, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang 050018, China.
Shufei ZhangCollege of Food Science and Biology, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang 050018, China.
Yuling XueJunlebao Dairy Group Co., Ltd., Shijiazhuang 050221, China.
Yaoguang ZhangJunlebao Dairy Group Co., Ltd., Shijiazhuang 050221, China.
Han LuCollege of Food Science and Biology, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang 050018, China.
Shijie WangCollege of Food Science and Biology, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang 050018, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2856-5057

Funding

The National Key R&D Program of China 2018YFC1604305The Program of Hebei Provincial Department of Science and Technology 19222805D
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Raw milk microbiota is complex and influenced by many factors that facilitate the introduction of undesirable microorganisms. Milk microbiota is closely related to the safety and quality of dairy products, and it is therefore critical to characterize the variation in the microbial composition of raw milk. In this cross-sectional study, the variation in raw milk microbiota throughout the year (n = 142) from three farms in China was analyzed using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, including α and β diversity, microbial composition, and the relationship between microbiota and milk quality parameters. This aimed to characterize the contamination risk of raw milk throughout the year and the changes in quality parameters caused by contamination. Collection month had a significant effect on microbial composition; microbial diversity was higher in raw milk collected in May and June, while milk collected in October and December had the lowest microbial diversity. Microbiota composition differed significantly between milk collected in January−June, July−August, and September−December (p < 0.05). Bacterial communities represented in raw milk at the phylum level mainly included Proteobacteria, Firmicutes and Bacteroidota; Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Streptococcus and Lactobacillus were the most common genera. Redundancy analysis (RDA) found strong correlations between microbial distribution and titratable acidity (TA), fat, and protein. Many genera were significantly correlated with TA, for example Acinetobacter (R = 0.426), Enhydrobacter (R = 0.309), Chryseobacterium (R = 0.352), Lactobacillus (R = −0.326), norank_o__DTU014 (R = −0.697), norank_f__SC-I-84 (R = −0.678), and Subgroup_10 (R = −0.721). Additionally, norank_f__ Muribaculaceae was moderately negatively correlated with fat (R = −0.476) and protein (R = −0.513). These findings provide new information on the ecology of raw milk microbiota at the farm level and contribute to the understanding of the variation in raw milk microbiota in China.

Indexed as

Chinese regiondiversity indexmicrobiotaquality parametersraw milktitratable acidity

Identifiers

PMID36230153
PMCPMC9563975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.