Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36229994›Full record

ReviewCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2023

Therapeutic potential of brain stimulation techniques in the treatment of mental, psychiatric, and cognitive disorders.

Jose Antonio Camacho-Conde, Maria Del Rosario Gonzalez-Bermudez, Marta Carretero-Rey, Zafar U Khan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A systematic review and meta-analysis of neuromodulation therapies for substance use disorders.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. In vivo microelectrode arrays for neuroscience.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2025
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jose Antonio Camacho-CondeLaboratory of Neurobiology, CIMES, University of Malaga, Campus Teatinos s/n, Malaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6912-8462
Maria Del Rosario Gonzalez-BermudezLaboratory of Neurobiology, CIMES, University of Malaga, Campus Teatinos s/n, Malaga, Spain.
Marta Carretero-ReyLaboratory of Neurobiology, CIMES, University of Malaga, Campus Teatinos s/n, Malaga, Spain.
Zafar U KhanLaboratory of Neurobiology, CIMES, University of Malaga, Campus Teatinos s/n, Malaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0742-399X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment for brain diseases has been disappointing because available medications have failed to produce clinical response across all the patients. Many patients either do not respond or show partial and inconsistent effect, and even in patients who respond to the medications have high relapse rates. Brain stimulation has been seen as an alternative and effective remedy. As a result, brain stimulation has become one of the most valuable therapeutic tools for combating against brain diseases. In last decade, studies with the application of brain stimulation techniques not only have grown exponentially but also have expanded to wide range of brain disorders. Brain stimulation involves passing electric currents into the cortical and subcortical area brain cells with the use of noninvasive as well as invasive methods to amend brain functions. Over time, technological advancements have evolved into the development of precise devices; however, at present, most used noninvasive techniques are repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), whereas the most common invasive technique is deep brain stimulation (DBS). In the current review, we will provide an overview of the potential of noninvasive (rTMS and tDCS) and invasive (DBS) brain stimulation techniques focusing on the treatment of mental, psychiatric, and cognitive disorders.

Indexed as

Brain DiseasesCognitive DysfunctionTranscranial Direct Current StimulationBrainHumansTranscranial Magnetic Stimulationclosed-circuit neuromodulationdeep brain stimulationinvasive brain stimulationnoninvasive brain stimulationrepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationtranscranial direct current stimulationtranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID36229994
PMCPMC9804057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.