Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36229872›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2022

Computational phenotyping of obstructive airway diseases: protocol for a systematic review.

Muwada Bashir Awad Bashir, Rani Basna, Guo-Qiang Zhang, Helena Backman, Anne Lindberg, Linda Ekerljung, Malin Axelsson, Linnea Hedman, Lowie Vanfleteren, Bo Lundbäck and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Muwada Bashir Awad BashirKrefting Research Centre, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden. muwada.bashir@gu.se.ORCID 0000-0003-3901-5384
Rani BasnaKrefting Research Centre, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Guo-Qiang ZhangKrefting Research Centre, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Helena BackmanSection of Sustainable Health/the OLIN Unit, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Anne LindbergSection of Medicine/the OLIN Unit, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Linda EkerljungKrefting Research Centre, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Malin AxelssonDepartment of Care Science, Faculty of Health and Society, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
Linnea HedmanDepartment of Health Sciences, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.
Lowie VanfleterenCOPD Center, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Bo LundbäckKrefting Research Centre, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Eva RönmarkSection of Sustainable Health/the OLIN Unit, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Bright I NwaruKrefting Research Centre, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, SE-405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
University of Gothenburg · SEUmeå University · SELuleå University of Technology · SEMalmö University · SESahlgrenska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the last decade, computational sciences have contributed immensely to characterization of phenotypes of airway diseases, but it is difficult to compare derived phenotypes across studies, perhaps as a result of the different decisions that fed into these phenotyping exercises. We aim to perform a systematic review of studies using computational approaches to phenotype obstructive airway diseases in children and adults. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for papers published between 2010 and 2020. Conferences proceedings, reference list of included papers, and experts will form additional sources of literature. We will include observational epidemiological studies that used a computational approach to derive phenotypes of chronic airway diseases, whether in a general population or in a clinical setting. Two reviewers will independently screen the retrieved studies for eligibility, extract relevant data, and perform quality appraisal of included studies. A third reviewer will arbitrate any disagreements in these processes. Quality appraisal of the studies will be undertaken using the Effective Public Health Practice Project quality assessment tool. We will use summary tables to describe the included studies. We will narratively synthesize the generated evidence, providing critical assessment of the populations, variables, and computational approaches used in deriving the phenotypes across studies

conclusionAs progress continues to be made in the area of computational phenotyping of chronic obstructive airway diseases, this systematic review, the first on this topic, will provide the state of the art on the field and highlight important perspectives for future works. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is needed for this work is based only on the published literature and does not involve collection of any primary or human data. REGISTRATION AND REPORTING: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020164898.

Indexed as

AsthmaPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdultChildExerciseExercise TherapyHumansResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as TopicAirway diseaseAsthmaClusteringComputationCOPDMachine learningPhenotypeSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36229872
PMCPMC9559879
OpenAlexW4304890947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.