ArticleBMC oral health2022
Evaluation of biofilm formation on acrylic resins used to fabricate dental temporary restorations with the use of 3D printing technology.
Article in BMC oral health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbiological evaluation of conjunctival anopthalmic flora after using digital 3D-printed ocular prosthesis compared to conventional one: a randomized clinical trial.BMC oral health · 2023Trial
- Surface Properties, Color Stability, and Bacterial Adhesion of Implant-Supported Provisional Restorative Materials: In Vitro Study.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial effect of treating thermoformable cellulose-based materials with essential oils.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- From Disease Control to Long-Term Stability: Regenerative and Prosthetic Management of Peri-Implantitis-A Five-Year Case Report.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
- Polishing of provisional crown materials: the effects onThe journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2026Article
- Influence of polishing methods on the physical properties of temporary restorations.Odontology · 2026Article
- Article
- Salivary characteristics and oral microbial dynamics in patients before and after maxillectomy with obturator prosthesis: a pilot prospective cohort study.The Saudi dental journal · 2026Article
- Microbiological behavior of 3D printing materials for indirect restorations: A scoping review.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
- A Case Report: Immediate Implant Placement with PRF, Photogrammetry-Guided Workflow, and Monolithic Zirconia Full-Arch Restoration.Reports (MDPI) · 2025Article
- Surface Roughness and Microbial Adhesion on Four Provisional Prosthodontic Restorative Materials.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Comparison of Color Stability and Surface Roughness of Interim Crowns Fabricated by Conventional, Milling and 3D Printing Methods.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2025Article
- The Effect of Manufacturing Factors on the Material Properties and Adhesion ofMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Next-Generation Dental Materials: Exploring Bacterial Biofilm Formation on 3D-Printable Resin-Based Composites.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Properties of 3D-Printed resins for interim restorations: effects of printing and post-curing protocols.Brazilian oral research · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Biofilm inhibition of denture cleaning tablets and carvacrol on denture bases produced with different techniques.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Article
- [Effect of printing orientation on physical and mechanical properties of 3D printing prosthodontic base resin materials].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2024Article
- Digital Workflow in Full Mouth Rehabilitation with Immediate Loading, Intraoral Welding and 3D-Printed Reconstructions in a Periodontal Patient: A Case Report.Reports (MDPI) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTemporary implant-retained restorations are required to support function and esthetics of the masticatory system until the final restoration is completed and delivered. Acrylic resins are commonly used in prosthetic dentistry and lately they have been used in three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. Since this technology it is fairly new, the number of studies on their susceptibility to microbial adhesion is low. Restorations placed even for a short period of time may become the reservoir for microorganisms that may affect the peri-implant tissues and trigger inflammation endangering further procedures. The aim of the study was to test the biofilm formation on acrylamide resins used to fabricate temporary restorations in 3D printing technology and to assess if the post-processing impacts microbial adhesion.
methodsDisk-shaped samples were manufactured using the 3D printing technique from three commercially available UV-curable resins consisting of acrylate and methacrylate oligomers with various time and inhibitors of polymerization (NextDent MFH bleach, NextDent 3D Plus, MazicD Temp). The tested samples were raw, polished and glazed. The ability to create biofilm by oral streptococci (S. mutans, S. sanguinis, S. oralis, S. mitis) was tested, as well as species with higher pathogenic potential: Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Candida albicans. The roughness of the materials was measured by an atomic force microscope. Biofilm formation was assessed after 72 h of incubation by crystal violet staining with absorbance measurement, quantification of viable microorganisms, and imaging with a scanning electron microscope (SEM).
resultsEach tested species formed the biofilm on the samples of all three resins. Post-production processing resulted in reduced roughness parameters and biofilm abundance. Polishing and glazing reduced roughness parameters significantly in the NextDent resin group, while glazing alone caused significant surface smoothing in Mazic Temp. A thin layer of microbial biofilm covered glazed resin surfaces with a small number of microorganisms for all tested strains except S. oralis and S. epidermidis, while raw and polished surfaces were covered with a dense biofilm, rich in microorganisms.
conclusionsUV-curing acrylic resins used for fabricating temporary restorations in the 3D technology are the interim solution, but are susceptible to adhesion and biofilm formation by oral streptococci, staphylococci and Candida. Post-processing and particularly glazing process significantly reduce bacterial biofilm formation and the risk of failure of final restoration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.