ArticleBMC ophthalmology2022
Screening for novel risk factors related to high myopia using machine learning.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in pathologic myopia: a review of clinical research studies.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Interpretable machine learning model based on blood parameters for screening high myopia.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Application of artificial intelligence in myopia prevention and control.Pediatric investigation · 2025Review
- Article
- Causal relationships between inflammatory cytokines and myopia: an analysis of genetic and observational studies.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
- Bibliometric analysis of hotspots and trends of global myopia research.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Association of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid intakes with juvenile myopia: A cross-sectional study based on the NHANES database.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Association between Plasma Metabolite Levels and Myopia: A 2-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHigh myopia-related complications have become a major cause of irreversible vision loss. Evaluating the association between potential factors and high myopia can provide insights into pathophysiologic mechanisms and further intervention targets for myopia progression.
methodParticipants aged 12-25 years from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001-2006 were selected for the analysis. Myopia was defined as spherical equivalent (sum of spherical error and half of the cylindrical error) of any eyes ≤-0.5 diopters. High myopia was defined as the spherical equivalent of any eye ≤ - 5.00 diopters. Essential variables were selected by Random Forest algorithm and verified by multivariable logistic regression.
resultsA total of 7,033 participants and 74 potential factors, including demographic (4 factors), physical examination (6 factors), nutritional and serological (45 factors), immunological (9 variables), and past medical history factors (10 factors), were included into the analysis. Random Forest algorithm found that several anthropometric, nutritional, and serological factors were associated with high myopia. Combined with multivariable logistic regression, high levels of serum vitamin A was significantly associated with an increased prevalence of high myopia (adjusted odd ratio = 1.46 for 1 µmol/L increment, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-2.10). Furthermore, we found that neither C-reactive protein nor asthma increased the risk and severity of myopia.
conclusionHigh levels of serum vitamin A was seemingly associated with an increased prevalence of high myopia. This borderline significant association should be interpreted with caution because the potential increased type I error after the multiple testing. It still needs further investigation regarding the mechanism underlying this association. Neither C-reactive protein nor asthma increased the risk and severity of myopia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.