ArticleWorld journal of urology2022
A model for sepsis prediction after retrograde intrarenal surgery and the use of the preoperative/postoperative white blood cell ratio to predict progression from sepsis to septic shock.
Article in World journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and external validation of the HCH and HPMS prognostic indices for sepsis: a retrospective model development study using a Multi-Objective Non-Newtonian Fluid optimization algorithm.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Explainable machine learning algorithms for preoperative risk stratification of urosepsis after retrograde intrarenal surgery.Urolithiasis · 2026Article
- [Analysis of risk factors and construction of a predictive model for perioperative urosepsis].Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026Article
- Risk factors for postoperative febrile urinary tract infection in patients with urolithiasis: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Exosomes as a biomarker in postoperative complications: a literature review.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- An interpretable machine learning model integrating computed tomography radiomics and clinical features for predicting the urosepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Article
- Beyond the sheath: unmasking true predictors of Post-fURS fever through propensitymatched precision.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Article
- A new scoring system to predict febrile urinary tract infection after retrograde intrarenal surgery.Urolithiasis · 2024Article
- Non-linear relationship of serum albumin-to-globulin ratio and cognitive function in American older people: a cross-sectional national health and nutrition examination survey 2011-2014 (NHANES) study.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Incidence of urinary infections and urosepsis after ureteroscopy for stone disease: a systematic review of literature.Therapeutic advances in urologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo study the predictors of sepsis and progression to septic shock after RIRS; to establish and validate predictive models accordingly.
methodsIn total, 1220 patients were included in the study during. Eight hundred forty-eight patients were assigned to the development cohort and 372 to the validation cohort according to medical record. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to screen independent risk factors for post-RIRS (Retrograde intrarenal surgery) sepsis and progression to septic shock. Nomogram prediction models were established according to the related independent risk factors. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration plots, and DCA (Decision curve analysis) were used to estimate the discrimination, calibration and clinical usefulness of the prediction model, respectively.
resultsIn the development cohort, sepsis occurred in 59 patients, 16 of whom developed septic shock. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that the independent risk factors for sepsis after RIRS were preoperative D-J stent implantation, hydronephrosis > 6.25 HU (Hounsfield units), AGR (Albumin/globulin ratio) < 1.95, hs-CRP/Alb (High-sensitivity C-reactive protein/albumin ratio) > 0.060, operating time > 67.5 min, and urinary nitrite positivity. The preoperative/postoperative WBC ratio > 1.5 was an independent risk factor for progression from sepsis to septic shock. In the development cohort, the AUC (Area under curve) for predicting sepsis risk was 0.845, and the AUC for predicting septic shock risk was 0.896; in the validation cohort, the corresponding values were 0.896 and 0.974, respectively. In the development cohort, the calibration test P values in the sepsis and septic shock cohorts, respectively, were 0.921 and 0.817; in the validation cohort, these values were 0.882 and 0.859. DCA of the model in the sepsis and septic shock cohorts showed threshold probabilities of 10-90% in the development cohort and 10-50% and 10-20% in the validation cohort.
conclusionThese individualized nomogram prediction models can improve the early identification of patients at risk for developing sepsis after RIRS or progressing from sepsis to septic shock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.