Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36229697›Full record

ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2023

Can machine learning accelerate soft material parameter identification from complex mechanical test data?

Sotirios Kakaletsis, Emma Lejeune, Manuel K Rausch

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sotirios KakaletsisDepartment of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
Emma LejeuneDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Manuel K RauschDepartment of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA. manuel.rausch@utexas.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1337-6472
The University of Texas at Austin · USBoston University · US

Funding

Using an Electrospun Surrogate Model to Investigate Mechanisms of Tricuspid Valve MaladaptationR01HL165251 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MANUEL Karl RAUSCH · 2022 to 2026
$4.3M
Human-Specific Prediction, Training, and Visualization Tools for the Tricuspid Valve from Existing DataR21HL161832 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI RAUSCH, MANUEL KARL · 2022 to 2023
$222k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL165251NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL161832NHLBI NIH HHS R21HL161832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying the constitutive parameters of soft materials often requires heterogeneous mechanical test modes, such as simple shear. In turn, interpreting the resulting complex deformations necessitates the use of inverse strategies that iteratively call forward finite element solutions. In the past, we have found that the cost of repeatedly solving non-trivial boundary value problems can be prohibitively expensive. In this current work, we leverage our prior experimentally derived mechanical test data to explore an alternative approach. Specifically, we investigate whether a machine learning-based approach can accelerate the process of identifying material parameters based on our mechanical test data. Toward this end, we pursue two different strategies. In the first strategy, we replace the forward finite element simulations within an iterative optimization framework with a machine learning-based metamodel. Here, we explore both Gaussian process regression and neural network metamodels. In the second strategy, we forgo the iterative optimization framework and use a stand alone neural network to predict the entire material parameter set directly from experimental results. We first evaluate both approaches with simple shear experiments on blood clot, an isotropic, homogeneous material. Next, we evaluate both approaches against simple shear and uniaxial loading experiments on right ventricular myocardium, an anisotropic, heterogeneous material. We find that replacing the forward finite element simulations with metamodels significantly accelerates the parameter identification process with excellent results in the case of blood clot, and with satisfying results in the case of right ventricular myocardium. On the other hand, we find that replacing the entire optimization framework with a neural network yielded unsatisfying results, especially for right ventricular myocardium. Overall, the importance of our work stems from providing a baseline example showing how machine learning can accelerate the process of material parameter identification for soft materials from complex mechanical data, and from providing an open access experimental and simulation dataset that may serve as a benchmark dataset for others interested in applying machine learning techniques to soft tissue biomechanics.

Indexed as

MyocardiumThrombosisFinite Element AnalysisHumansMachine LearningMechanical TestsNeural Networks, ComputerStress, MechanicalBlood clotHeterogeneityHyperelasticityMyocardiumOpen scienceSimple shear

Identifiers

PMID36229697
PMCPMC11048729
OpenAlexW4305072454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.