ArticleScientific reports2022
Estimation of systolic blood pressure by Random Forest using heart sounds and a ballistocardiogram.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A ballistocardiogram dataset with reference ECG signals for bed-based heart rhythm assessment.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Multi-Source Causal Invariance for Cuffless Blood Pressure Estimation Based on Photoplethysmography Signal Features.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Improved Confidence-Interval Estimations Using Uncertainty Measure and Weighted Feature Decisions for Cuff-Less Blood-Pressure Measurements.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Emerging Paradigms in Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring: Evaluating the Efficacy and Application of Innovative Textile-Based Wearables.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cuffless blood pressure measurement enables unobtrusive and continuous monitoring that can be integrated with wearable devices to extend healthcare to non-hospital settings. Most of the current research has focused on the estimation of blood pressure based on pulse transit time or pulse arrival time using ECG or peripheral cardiac pulse signals as proximal time references. This study proposed the use of a phonocardiogram (PCG) and ballistocardiogram (BCG), two signals detected noninvasively, to estimate systolic blood pressure (SBP). For this, the PCG and the BCG were simultaneously measured in 21 volunteers in the rest, activity, and post-activity conditions. Different features were considered based on the relationships between these signals. The intervals between S1 and S2 of the PCG and the I, J, and K waves of the BCG were statistically analyzed. The IJ and JK slopes were also estimated as additional features to train the machine-learning algorithm. The intervals S1-J, S1-K, S1-I, J-S2, and I-S2 were negatively correlated with changes in SBP (p-val < 0.01). The features were used as explanatory variables for a regressor based on the Random Forest. It was possible to estimate the systolic blood pressure with a mean error of 3.3 mmHg with a standard deviation of ± 5 mmHg. Therefore, we foresee that this proposal has potential applications for wearable devices that use low-cost embedded systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.