Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36229633›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2022

Exploring spatiotemporal interactions: On the superiority of time over space.

Kévin Vidaud-Laperrière, Lionel Brunel, Arielle Syssau-Vaccarella, Pom Charras

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Presentation time shapes perceived room size in visual and auditory modalities.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kévin Vidaud-LaperrièreUniversité Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, EPSYLON EA 4556, F34000, Montpellier, France.
Lionel BrunelUniversité Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, EPSYLON EA 4556, F34000, Montpellier, France.
Arielle Syssau-VaccarellaUniversité Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, EPSYLON EA 4556, F34000, Montpellier, France.
Pom CharrasUniversité Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, EPSYLON EA 4556, F34000, Montpellier, France. pom.charras@univ-montp3.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6010-677X
Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier · FRUniversité de Montpellier · FR

Funding

Région Occitanie "Recherche & Sociétés" ESR_R&S_000078/2018-003280
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Space and time mutually influence each other such that space affects time estimation (space-on-time effect), and conversely (time-on-space effect). These reciprocal interferences suggest that space and time are intrinsically linked in the human mind. Yet, recent evidence for an asymmetrical advantage for space over time challenges the classical theoretical interpretation. In the present study, we tested whether the superiority of space over time in magnitude interference depends on the cognitive resources engaged in the spatial task. We conducted three experiments in which participants performed judgments on temporal intervals and spatial distances in separate blocks. In each trial, two dots were successively flashed at various locations, and participants were to judge whether the duration or distance between the dots was short or long. To manipulate cognitive demands in the spatial task, distances varied across experiments (highly discriminable for the non-demanding spatial task in Experiment 1 and scarcely discriminable for the demanding spatial task in Experiment 2). Importantly, this manipulation tended to enhance perceptual sensitivity (as indexed by Weber Ratios) but slowed down the decision process (as indexed by response times) in the demanding experiment. Our results provide evidence for robust space-on-time and time-on-space effects (Experiments 1 and 2). More crucially, the involvement of cognitive resources in a demanding spatial task causes a massive time-on-space effect: Spatial judgments are indeed more influenced by irrelevant temporal information than the reverse (Experiments 2 and 3). Overall, the flexibility of spatiotemporal interferences has direct theoretical implications and questions the origins of space-time interaction.

Indexed as

JudgmentSpace PerceptionHumansReaction TimeCognitive resourcesMagnitude processingResponse timesSequential sensory informationSpace-time interference

Identifiers

PMID36229633
OpenAlexW4306147730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.