ArticleScientific reports2022
Applicability of modified weibull extension distribution in modeling censored medical datasets: a bayesian perspective.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- On a Bayesian multivariate survival tree approach based on three frailty models.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- DUS Topp-Leone-G Family of Distributions: Baseline Extension, Properties, Estimation, Simulation and Useful Applications.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are some contributions analyzing the censored medical datasets using modifications of the conventional lifetime distribution; however most of the said contributions did not considered the modification of the Weibull distribution (WD). The WD is an important lifetime model. Due to its prime importance in modeling life data, many researchers have proposed different modifications of WD. One of the most recent modifications of WD is Modified Weibull Extension distribution (MWED). However, the ability of MWED to model the censored medical data has not yet been explored in the literature. We have explored the suitability of the model in modeling censored medical datasets. The analysis has been carried out using Bayesian methods under different loss functions and informative priors. The approximate Bayes estimates have been computed using Lindley's approximation. Based on detailed simulation study and real life analysis, it has been concluded that Bayesian methods performed better as compared to maximum likelihood estimates. In case of small samples, the performance of Bayes estimates under ELF and informative prior was the best. However, in case of large samples, the choice of prior and loss function did not affect the efficiency of the results to a large extend. The MWED performed efficiently in modeling real censored datasets relating to survival times of the leukemia and bile duct cancer patients. The MWED was explored to be a very promising candidate model for modeling censored medical datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.