Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36229565›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Effectiveness of a quality improvement strategy with implementation of a specific visual tool to promote ICU early mobilization.

Patricia Nery de Souza, Jessica Borges Kroth, Amanda Dos Santos Ligero, Juliana Mesti Mendes, Ana Lígia Vasconcelos Maida, Laerte Pastore, Wellington Pereira Yamaguti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Patricia Nery de SouzaHospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil. patnerysouza@gmail.com.
Jessica Borges KrothHospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
Amanda Dos Santos LigeroHospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
Juliana Mesti MendesHospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Lígia Vasconcelos MaidaHospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
Laerte PastoreHospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.
Wellington Pereira YamagutiHospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early progressive mobilization is a safe strategy in the intensive care unit (ICU), however, it is still considered challenging by the inherent barriers and poor adherence to early mobilization protocol. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a quality improvement (QI) multifaceted strategy with implementation of a specific visual tool, the "mobility clock", in reducing non-compliance with the institutional early mobilization (EM) protocol in adult ICUs. A single-center QI with a retrospective before-after comparison study was conducted using data from medical records and hospital electronic databases. Patients from different periods presented similar baseline characteristics. After the QI strategy, a decline in "non-compliance" with the protocol was observed compared to the previous period (10.11% vs. 26.97%, p < 0.004). The proportion of patients walking was significantly higher (49.44% vs. 29.21%, p < 0.006) and the ICU readmission rate was lower in the "after" period (2.25% vs. 11.24%; p = 0.017). The multifaceted strategy specifically designed considering institutional barriers was effective to increase out of bed mobilization, to reduce the "non-compliance" rate with the protocol and to achieve a higher level of mobility in adult ICUs of a tertiary hospital.

Indexed as

Early AmbulationQuality ImprovementAdultHumansIntensive Care UnitsRetrospective StudiesTertiary Care Centers

Identifiers

PMID36229565
PMCPMC9562414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.