Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36229437›Full record

ArticleCell discovery2022

Genetic deconvolution of fetal and maternal cell-free DNA in maternal plasma enables next-generation non-invasive prenatal screening.

Chenming Xu, Jianli Li, Songchang Chen, Xiaoqiang Cai, Ruilin Jing, Xiaomei Qin, Dong Pan, Xin Zhao, Dongyang Ma, Xiufeng Xu and 21 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell discovery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Identification of maternalAnnals of medicine · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Advances in cfDNA research for pregnancy-related diseases.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. cfDNA from maternal plasma for noninvasive screening of fetal exomes.American journal of clinical and experimental immunology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Chenming Xu *Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Institute of Reproduction and Development, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. chenming_xu2006@163.com.
Jianli Li *Beijing BioBiggen Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Songchang Chen *Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Institute of Reproduction and Development, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoqiang Cai *Beijing BioBiggen Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Ruilin JingBeijing BioBiggen Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Xiaomei QinBeijing BioBiggen Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Dong PanBeijing BioBiggen Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Xin ZhaoBeijing BioBiggen Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Dongyang MaBeijing BioBiggen Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Xiufeng XuBeijing BioBiggen Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Xiaojun LiuBeijing BioBiggen Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Can WangBeijing BioBiggen Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Bingxin YangInternational Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Lanlan ZhangInternational Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Shuyuan LiInternational Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yiyao ChenInternational Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Nina PanInternational Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Ping TangJiaxing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, China.
Jieping SongMedical Genetics Center, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Nian LiuMedical Genetics Center, Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Chen ZhangObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Institute of Reproduction and Development, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zhiwei ZhangBeijing BioBiggen Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Xiang QiuObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Weiliang LuObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Chunmei YingObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaotian LiObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Congjian XuObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yanlin WangInternational Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yanting WuObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Institute of Reproduction and Development, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. yanting_wu@163.com.
He-Feng HuangObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Institute of Reproduction and Development, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. huanghefg@hotmail.com.
Jinglan ZhangObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Institute of Reproduction and Development, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. jinglanzhang@foxmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4600-7123

Funding

Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) 2019-12M-5-064National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 81661128010National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 81671412National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 82071661Shanghai Hospital Development Center (SHDC) SHDC12018X17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) analyzes circulating fetal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in maternal peripheral blood for selected aneuploidies or microdeletion/duplication syndromes. Many genetic disorders are refractory to NIPS largely because the maternal genetic material constitutes most of the total cfDNA present in the maternal plasma, which hinders the detection of fetus-specific genetic variants. Here, we developed an innovative sequencing method, termed coordinative allele-aware target enrichment sequencing (COATE-seq), followed by multidimensional genomic analyses of sequencing read depth, allelic fraction, and linked single nucleotide polymorphisms, to accurately separate the fetal genome from the maternal background. Analytical confounders including multiple gestations, maternal copy number variations, and absence of heterozygosity were successfully recognized and precluded for fetal variant analyses. In addition, fetus-specific genomic characteristics, including the cfDNA fragment length, meiotic error origins, meiotic recombination, and recombination breakpoints were identified which reinforced the fetal variant assessment. In 1129 qualified pregnancies tested, 54 fetal aneuploidies, 8 microdeletions/microduplications, and 8 monogenic variants were detected with 100% sensitivity and 99.3% specificity. Using the comprehensive cfDNA genomic analysis tools developed, we found that 60.3% of aneuploidy samples had aberrant meiotic recombination providing important insights into the mechanism underlying meiotic nondisjunctions. Altogether, we show that the genetic deconvolution of the fetal and maternal cfDNA enables thorough and accurate delineation of fetal genome which paves the way for the next-generation prenatal screening of essentially all types of human genetic disorders.

Identifiers

PMID36229437
PMCPMC9562363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.