Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36229148›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

How commercial actors used different types of power to influence policy on restricting food marketing: a qualitative study with policy actors in Thailand.

Sirinya Phulkerd, Jeff Collin, Yandisa Ngqangashe, Anne Marie Thow, Ashley Schram, Carmen Huckel Schneider, Sharon Friel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Sirinya PhulkerdInstitute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University, Salaya, Thailand sirinya.phu@mahidol.ac.th.ORCID 0000-0001-9373-3120
Jeff CollinGlobal Health Policy Unit, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Yandisa NgqangasheMenzies Centre for Health Governance, School of Regulation and Global Governance, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Anne Marie ThowMenzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Ashley SchramMenzies Centre for Health Governance, School of Regulation and Global Governance, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Carmen Huckel SchneiderMenzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Sharon FrielMenzies Centre for Health Governance, School of Regulation and Global Governance, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Australian National University · AUThe University of Sydney · AUGlobal Policy Institute · USMahidol University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThere is limited research focused explicitly on understanding how commercial actors use different forms of power to influence policy decision making in Thailand. This study aimed to identify how the food industry has used structural, instrumental and discursive power to influence policy on restricting food marketing in Thailand. STUDY

designQualitative study using in-depth semistructured interviews SETTINGS: Thailand.

participantsThe interviews were conducted with 20 participants (of a total of 29 invited actors) from government, civil society, technical experts, international organisation and the food and advertising industry. Interview data were identified in the transcripts and analysed using abductive methods.

resultsNon-commercial actors perceived the commercial actors' structural power (its economic influence and structurally privileged position) as central to understanding the government having not implemented policy to restrict food marketing. The commercial actors' instrumental power was observed through sponsorship, campaign and lobbying activities. Discursive power was used by the industry to shift responsibility away from the food companies and onto their customers, by focusing their messaging on freedom of consumer choice and consumer health literacy.

conclusionsThis study examined different types of power that commercial actors were perceived to use to influence policy to restrict food marketing in Thailand. The study showed arguments and institutional processes used to enhance commercial actors' ability to shape the policy decision for nutrition, public opinion and the broader regulatory environment. The findings help governments and other stakeholders to anticipate industry efforts to counter policy. The findings also suggest the need for governance structures that counter industry power, including comprehensive monitoring and enforcement in policy implementation.

Indexed as

MarketingPolicy MakingFood IndustryHealth PolicyHumansPolicyThailandhealth policynutritionpublic health

Identifiers

PMID36229148
PMCPMC9562312
OpenAlexW4304974356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.