Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36229144›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Protocol for a scoping review on misuse of psychoactive medicines and its consequences.

Ana Carmona Araújo, Rita João Casal, João Goulão, Ana Paula Martins

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ana Carmona AraújoiMed.ULisboa, Lisboa, Portugal ana.araujo@ff.ulisboa.pt.ORCID 0000-0003-4328-4341
Rita João CasalUniversidade Europeia, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9326-0714
João GoulãoSICAD, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2851-2003
Ana Paula MartinsiMed.ULisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3988-1162
Universidade Europeia · PTUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMisuse of psychoactive medicines, especially prescription opioids, but also benzodiazepines, hypnotics and sedatives, has become a significant public health issue in some countries, especially in the USA, where it has been extensively documented, as well as in Canada and Australia. However, in the European Union (EU) published literature on the topic is scarce and heterogeneous regarding definitions, sources of data, tools and methods of analysis.The aim of this scoping review is to map the key concepts on psychoactive medicines' misuse and examine the existing body of evidence on this topic in the EU. Data on the possible consequences of medicines' misuse-adverse drug reactions, poisonings, hospitalisations and deaths-will also be analysed. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The scoping review will follow the framework of Arksey and O'Malley, further developed by Levac ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Since the scoping review methodology focuses on published data, this study does not require ethical approval. We will publish our findings in a peer-reviewed journal and plan to disseminate our work in conferences and scientific meetings. REGISTRATION DETAILS: This scoping review protocol is registered in the Open Science Framework (OSF; see https://osf.io/fzr9u) and has also been shared as a preprint in this free and open-source project management repository. It is available at https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/y3s4q.

Indexed as

Peer ReviewResearch DesignBenzodiazepinesDatabases, FactualHumansHypnotics and SedativesScoping Reviews as TopicBenzodiazepinesHypnotics and SedativesEPIDEMIOLOGYMENTAL HEALTHPUBLIC HEALTHSubstance misuse

Identifiers

PMID36229144
PMCPMC9562289
OpenAlexW4306155139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.