Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36228643›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Haematology2022

UCART19, a first-in-class allogeneic anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (CALM): a phase 1, dose-escalation trial.

Reuben Benjamin, Nitin Jain, Marcela V Maus, Nicolas Boissel, Charlotte Graham, Agnieszka Jozwik, Deborah Yallop, Marina Konopleva, Matthew J Frigault, Takanori Teshima and 13 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Haematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Emerging strategies to reduce the side effects of CAR-T cell therapy: focusing on gene editing and nanotechnology.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Strategies to eliminate native T cell receptors for adoptive T cell therapies.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Reuben BenjaminDepartment of Haematological Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Rayne Institute, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kings College London, London, UK. Electronic address: reuben.benjamin@kcl.ac.uk.
Nitin JainThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Marcela V MausCellular Immunotherapy Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Nicolas BoisselDepartment of Haematology, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France.
Charlotte GrahamDepartment of Haematological Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Agnieszka JozwikDepartment of Haematological Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Deborah YallopDepartment of Haematological Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Marina KonoplevaThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Matthew J FrigaultCellular Immunotherapy Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Takanori TeshimaDepartment of Haematology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Koji KatoDepartment of Haematology, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Floriane BoucaudInstitut de Recherches Internationales Servier, Suresnes, France.
Svetlana BalandraudInstitut de Recherches Internationales Servier, Suresnes, France.
Athos Gianella-BorradoriInstitut de Recherches Internationales Servier, Suresnes, France.
Florence BinlichInstitut de Recherches Internationales Servier, Suresnes, France.
Ibtissam MarchiqInstitut de Recherches Servier, Croissy-sur-Seine, France.
Sandra DupouyInstitut de Recherches Internationales Servier, Suresnes, France.
Maria Almena-CarrascoInstitut de Recherches Internationales Servier, Suresnes, France.
Matthieu PannauxInstitut de Recherches Internationales Servier, Suresnes, France.
Sylvain FouliardInstitut de Recherches Internationales Servier, Suresnes, France.
Eolia BrissotDepartment of Haematology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Paris, France.
Mohamad MohtyDepartment of Haematology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Paris, France.
CALM Study Group

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prognosis for adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia remains poor. UCART19, an allogeneic genome-edited anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell product derived from healthy donors and available for immediate clinical use, offers a potential therapeutic option for such patients. The CALM trial is a first-in-human study evaluating the safety and antileukaemic activity of UCART19 in adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

methodsThis phase 1, open-label study was conducted at eight centres across France, the UK, the USA, and Japan. Adult patients aged 16-70 years with CD19-positive relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia who had morphological relapse or a minimal residual disease level of at least 1 × 10

findingsBetween Aug 1, 2016, and June 30, 2020, 25 patients were enrolled in the study and treated with UCART19. Median duration of follow-up was 12·8 months (IQR 2·8-24·8). Median age was 37 years (IQR 28-45). 14 (56%) patients were male and 11 (44%) female. 17 (68%) patients were White, two (8%) Black, two (8%) Asian, and four (16%) from other racial or ethnic groups. Three patients developed dose-limiting toxicities (one at each dose level); one had grade 4 cytokine release syndrome and two had grade 4 prolonged cytopenias. Grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome was reported in six (24%) patients and grade 3 or higher neurological toxicity in one (4%) patient. Grade 3 or higher infections occurred in seven (28%) patients, and grade 4 prolonged cytopenia in four (16%) patients. Two (8%) patients developed grade 1 acute cutaneous graft-versus-host disease. 14 patients died, nine from progressive disease and five from infections or other complications, of which four were considered to be related to UCART19 or lymphodepletion, or both. After a median of follow-up of 12·8 months (IQR 2·8-24·8), overall response rate was 48% (95% CI 28-69; 12 of 25 patients), duration of response and median relapse-free survival were 7·4 months (95% CI 1·8 to not calculable), progression-free survival was 2·1 months (95% CI 1·2-2·8), and overall survival was 13·4 months (95% CI 4·8-23·0).

interpretationUCART19 had a manageable safety profile, and showed evidence of antileukaemic activity in heavily pretreated adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. This study shows that allogeneic off-the-shelf CAR T cells can be used safely to treat patients with relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

fundingServier.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationLymphoma, FollicularPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAdultAntigens, CD19Cytokine Release SyndromeFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAntigens, CD19Receptors, Chimeric Antigen

Identifiers

PMID36228643
PMCPMC11575699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.