ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2022
Design and development of hybrid optimization enabled deep learning model for COVID-19 detection with comparative analysis with DCNN, BIAT-GRU, XGBoost.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Applied Machine Learning Techniques to Diagnose Voice-Affecting Conditions and Disorders: Systematic Literature Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Pooled it
- WDRIV-Net: a weighted ensemble transfer learning to improve automatic type stratification of lumbar intervertebral disc bulge, prolapse, and herniation.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Article
- Cough recognition in pneumoconiosis patients based on a flexible patch with an embedded ACC sensor for remote monitoring.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- A transfer learning approach on MRI-based radiomics signature for overall survival prediction of low-grade and high-grade gliomas.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recent investigation has started for evaluating the human respiratory sounds, like voice recorded, cough, and breathing from hospital confirmed Covid-19 tools, which differs from healthy person's sound. The cough-based detection of Covid-19 also considered with non-respiratory and respiratory sounds data related with all declared situations. Covid-19 is respiratory disease, which is usually produced by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, it is more indispensable to detect the positive cases for reducing further spread of virus, and former treatment of affected patients. With constant rise in the COVID-19 cases, there has been a constant rise in the need of efficient and safe ways to detect an infected individual. With the cases multiplying constantly, the current detecting devices like RT-PCR and fast testing kits have become short in supply. An effectual Covid-19 detection model using devised hybrid Honey Badger Optimization-based Deep Neuro Fuzzy Network (HBO-DNFN) is developed in this paper. Here, the audio signal is considered as input for detecting Covid-19. The gaussian filter is applied to input signal for removing the noises and then feature extraction is performed. The substantial features, like spectral roll-off, spectral bandwidth, Mel frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCC), spectral flatness, zero crossing rate, spectral centroid, mean square energy and spectral contract are extracted for further processing. Finally, DNFN is applied for detecting Covid-19 and the deep leaning model is trained by designed hybrid HBO algorithm. Accordingly, the developed Hybrid HBO method is newly designed by incorporating Honey Badger optimization Algorithm (HBA) and Jaya algorithm. The performance of developed Covid-19 detection model is evaluated using three metrics, like testing accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. The developed Hybrid HBO-based DNFN is outpaced than other existing approaches in terms of testing accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of "0.9176, 0.9218 and 0. 9219". All the test results are validated with the k-fold cross validation method in order to make an assessment of the generalizability of these results. When k-fold value is 9, sensitivity of existing techniques and developed JHBO-based DNFN is 0.8982, 0.8816, 0.8938, and 0.9207. The sensitivity of developed approach is improved by means of gaussian filtering model. The specificity of DCNN is 0.9125, BI-AT-GRU is 0.8926, and XGBoost is 0.9014, while developed JHBO-based DNFN is 0.9219 in k-fold value 9.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.