Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36228016›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2022

Effect of different training frequencies on maximal strength performance and muscle hypertrophy in trained individuals-a within-subject design.

Ricardo P Neves, Felipe C Vechin, Emerson L Teixeira, Demostenys D da Silva, Carlos Ugrinowitsch, Hamilton Roschel, André Y Aihara, Valmor Tricoli

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Effects ofNutrients · 2025
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ricardo P NevesSchool of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3599-1102
Felipe C VechinSchool of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Emerson L TeixeiraSchool of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Demostenys D da SilvaSchool of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Carlos UgrinowitschSchool of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Hamilton RoschelSchool of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
André Y AiharaDiagnostics of the Americas S/A (DASA), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Valmor TricoliSchool of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies comparing resistance training (RT) frequencies may have been affected by the large between-subject variability. This study aimed to compare the changes in lower limbs maximal dynamic strength (1RM) and quadriceps femoris cross-sectional area (CSA) after a RT with different weekly frequencies in strength-trained individuals using a within-subject design. Twenty-four men participated in a 9-week RT program, being randomly divided into two conditions: resistance training with equalized total training volume (RTEV) and with unequalized total training volume (RTUV). The RT protocol used the unilateral leg press 45° exercise and each subject's lower limb executed one of the proposed frequencies (one and three times/week). All conditions effectively increased 1RM and CSA (p<0.001); however, no significant differences were observed in the values of 1RM (p = 0.454) and CSA (p = 0.310) between the RT frequencies in the RTEV and RTUV conditions. Therefore, RT performed three times a week showed similar increases in 1RM and CSA to the program performed once a week, regardless of training volume equalization. Nevertheless, when the higher RT frequency allowed the application of a greater TTV (i.e., RTUV), higher effect size (ES) values (0.51 and 0.63, 1RM and CSA, respectively) were observed for the adaptations.

Indexed as

Muscle StrengthResistance TrainingHumansHypertrophyMaleMuscle, SkeletalQuadriceps MuscleWeight Lifting

Identifiers

PMID36228016
PMCPMC9560172
OpenAlexW4305040996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.