Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36228010›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2022

Nonamer dependent RAG cleavage at CpGs can explain mechanism of chromosomal translocations associated to lymphoid cancers.

Amita M Paranjape, Sagar S Desai, Mayilaadumveettil Nishana, Urbi Roy, Namrata M Nilavar, Amrita Mondal, Rupa Kumari, Gudapureddy Radha, Vijeth Kumar Katapadi, Bibha Choudhary and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mutations atMolecular and cellular biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Amita M ParanjapeDepartment of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5430-6943
Sagar S DesaiInstitute of Bioinformatics and Applied Biotechnology, Electronics City, Bangalore, India.
Mayilaadumveettil NishanaDepartment of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.
Urbi RoyDepartment of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6807-3562
Namrata M NilavarDepartment of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.
Amrita MondalDepartment of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7758-9667
Rupa KumariDepartment of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.
Gudapureddy RadhaDepartment of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.
Vijeth Kumar KatapadiDepartment of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3586-2749
Bibha ChoudharyInstitute of Bioinformatics and Applied Biotechnology, Electronics City, Bangalore, India.
Sathees C RaghavanDepartment of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3003-1417
Indian Institute of Science Bangalore · INIndian Institute of Science Education and Research Thiruvananthapuram · INInstitute of Bioinformatics and Applied Biotechnology · INManipal Academy of Higher Education · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosomal translocations are considered as one of the major causes of lymphoid cancers. RAG complex, which is responsible for V(D)J recombination, can also cleave non-B DNA structures and cryptic RSSs in the genome leading to chromosomal translocations. The mechanism and factors regulating the illegitimate function of RAGs resulting in oncogenesis are largely unknown. Upon in silico analysis of 3760 chromosomal translocations from lymphoid cancer patients, we find that 93% of the translocation breakpoints possess adjacent cryptic nonamers (RAG binding sequences), of which 77% had CpGs in proximity. As a proof of principle, we show that RAGs can efficiently bind to cryptic nonamers present at multiple fragile regions and cleave at adjacent mismatches generated to mimic the deamination of CpGs. ChIP studies reveal that RAGs can indeed recognize these fragile sites on a chromatin context inside the cell. Finally, we show that AID, the cytidine deaminase, plays a significant role during the generation of mismatches at CpGs and reconstitute the process of RAG-dependent generation of DNA breaks both in vitro and inside the cells. Thus, we propose a novel mechanism for generation of chromosomal translocation, where RAGs bind to the cryptic nonamer sequences and direct cleavage at adjacent mismatch generated due to deamination of meCpGs or cytosines.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsTranslocation, GeneticChromatinCpG IslandsCytidine DeaminaseDNAHomeodomain ProteinsHumansChromatinCytidine DeaminaseDNAHomeodomain Proteins

Identifiers

PMID36228010
PMCPMC9595545
OpenAlexW4305071472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.