Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36228003›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2022

CNAViz: An interactive webtool for user-guided segmentation of tumor DNA sequencing data.

Zubair Lalani, Gillian Chu, Silas Hsu, Shaw Kagawa, Michael Xiang, Simone Zaccaria, Mohammed El-Kebir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zubair LalaniDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America.
Gillian ChuDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2205-730X
Silas HsuDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America.
Shaw KagawaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America.
Michael XiangDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America.
Simone ZaccariaComputational Cancer Genomics Research Group, University College London Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Mohammed El-KebirDepartment of Computer Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1468-2407

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Copy-number aberrations (CNAs) are genetic alterations that amplify or delete the number of copies of large genomic segments. Although they are ubiquitous in cancer and, thus, a critical area of current cancer research, CNA identification from DNA sequencing data is challenging because it requires partitioning of the genome into complex segments with the same copy-number states that may not be contiguous. Existing segmentation algorithms address these challenges either by leveraging the local information among neighboring genomic regions, or by globally grouping genomic regions that are affected by similar CNAs across the entire genome. However, both approaches have limitations: overclustering in the case of local segmentation, or the omission of clusters corresponding to focal CNAs in the case of global segmentation. Importantly, inaccurate segmentation will lead to inaccurate identification of CNAs. For this reason, most pan-cancer research studies rely on manual procedures of quality control and anomaly correction. To improve copy-number segmentation, we introduce CNAViz, a web-based tool that enables the user to simultaneously perform local and global segmentation, thus overcoming the limitations of each approach. Using simulated data, we demonstrate that by several metrics, CNAViz allows the user to obtain more accurate segmentation relative to existing local and global segmentation methods. Moreover, we analyze six bulk DNA sequencing samples from three breast cancer patients. By validating with parallel single-cell DNA sequencing data from the same samples, we show that by using CNAViz, our user was able to obtain more accurate segmentation and improved accuracy in downstream copy-number calling.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNeoplasmsAlgorithmsDNA Copy Number VariationsDNA, NeoplasmFemaleHumansSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID36228003
PMCPMC9595559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.