ArticlePloS one2022
Optimal follow-up period after switching to another inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2 agonist in patients with asthma: A retrospective study using Japanese administrative claims data.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Switching inhalation devices is a reasonable option if problems with control, adherence, or inhalation technique occur in patients with asthma treated with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting β2 agonist (LABA). However, evidence to determine the extent to which the carefully monitored period persists after switching is insufficient. In this study, we aimed to investigate the duration of the carefully monitored period after switching to another ICS/LABA. This retrospective study used claims data from Japanese health insurance associations from May 2014 to April 2019. A total of 1,951 patients who switched to another ICS/LABA during the study period were selected for analysis. The relative risk of the first exacerbation after switching was calculated for each four-week interval after the switch compared with that before the switch in a self-controlled case series design. We further assessed patient background associated with exacerbations during the follow-up period. In the primary analysis, the risk of asthma exacerbation compared to the control period was derived from a conditional logistic regression model, which showed a significant decrease immediately after the switch (1 to 4 weeks, Odds ratio [OR] 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-0.54). Subsequently, the risk increased again and was not significantly different from the control period until week 32 (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.29-1.04). In a sensitivity analysis among patients with a history of exacerbations, up to week 20 was the period of no continuous risk reduction (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.41-1.70). In the secondary analysis, chronic rhinosinusitis, sleep disorders, and a history of asthma exacerbation were significantly associated with asthma exacerbation. The incidence of exacerbation remained high for approximately 4 to 7 months after patients with asthma switched to another ICS/LABA. Therefore, these patients should be carefully monitored for at least 4 to 7 months and should be re-assessed at an earlier point in time, if necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.