Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36227835›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2022

Circadian regulation of the transcriptome in a complex polyploid crop.

Hannah Rees, Rachel Rusholme-Pilcher, Paul Bailey, Joshua Colmer, Benjamen White, Connor Reynolds, Sabrina Jaye Ward, Benedict Coombes, Calum A Graham, Luíza Lane de Barros Dantas and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Circadian gating: concepts, processes, and opportunities.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Investigating Circadian Gating of Temperature Responsive Genes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hannah ReesEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Rachel Rusholme-PilcherEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Paul BaileyRoyal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Joshua ColmerEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Benjamen WhiteEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Connor ReynoldsEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Sabrina Jaye WardEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Benedict CoombesEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Calum A GrahamJohn Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Luíza Lane de Barros DantasJohn Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Antony N DoddJohn Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Anthony HallEarlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1806-020X
Norwich Research Park · GBJohn Innes Centre · GBRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/CCG1720/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/CSP1720/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M009122/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M011216/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N023145/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P013511/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P016855/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/J/000PR9788Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/T/000PR9783Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/T/000PR9816Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/T/000PR9819Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/V509267/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The circadian clock is a finely balanced timekeeping mechanism that coordinates programmes of gene expression. It is currently unknown how the clock regulates expression of homoeologous genes in polyploids. Here, we generate a high-resolution time-course dataset to investigate the circadian balance between sets of 3 homoeologous genes (triads) from hexaploid bread wheat. We find a large proportion of circadian triads exhibit imbalanced rhythmic expression patterns, with no specific subgenome favoured. In wheat, period lengths of rhythmic transcripts are found to be longer and have a higher level of variance than in other plant species. Expression of transcripts associated with circadian controlled biological processes is largely conserved between wheat and Arabidopsis; however, striking differences are seen in agriculturally critical processes such as starch metabolism. Together, this work highlights the ongoing selection for balance versus diversification in circadian homoeologs and identifies clock-controlled pathways that might provide important targets for future wheat breeding.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisCircadian ClocksCircadian RhythmGene Expression Regulation, PlantPlant BreedingPolyploidyStarchTranscriptomeTriticumStarch

Identifiers

PMID36227835
PMCPMC9560141
OpenAlexW4305057759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.