Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36227827›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2023

Linearized Analysis of Noise and Resolution for DL-Based Image Generation.

Jingyan Xu, Frederic Noo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jingyan Xu
Frederic Noo

Funding

FAIR-CT: a practical approach to enable ultra-low dose CT for longitudinal disease and treatment monitoringR21EB029179 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI NOO, FREDERIC, YIN, ZHYE · 2020 to 2021
$493k
Brain phantom generation by generative adversarial net (GAN) for AI-based emission tomographyR03EB030653 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SHAO, WENYI, XU, JINGYAN · 2021 to 2022
$164k
NIBIB NIH HHS R03 EB030653NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB029179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep-learning (DL) based CT image generation methods are often evaluated using RMSE and SSIM. By contrast, conventional model-based image reconstruction (MBIR) methods are often evaluated using image properties such as resolution, noise, bias. Calculating such image properties requires time consuming Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. For MBIR, linearized analysis using first order Taylor expansion has been developed to characterize noise and resolution without MC simulations. This inspired us to investigate if linearization can be applied to DL networks to enable efficient characterization of resolution and noise. We used FBPConvNet as an example DL network and performed extensive numerical evaluations, including both computer simulations and real CT data. Our results showed that network linearization works well under normal exposure settings. For such applications, linearization can characterize image noise and resolutions without running MC simulations. We provide with this work the computational tools to implement network linearization. The efficiency and ease of implementation of network linearization can hopefully popularize the physics-related image quality measures for DL applications. Our methodology is general; it allows flexible compositions of DL nonlinear modules and linear operators such as filtered-backprojection (FBP). For the latter, we develop a generic method for computing the covariance images that is needed for network linearization.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedComputer SimulationRadiation DosageSignal-To-Noise Ratio

Identifiers

PMID36227827
PMCPMC10132822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.