Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36227531›Full record

ArticleRheumatology and therapy2023

Validation of the PROFAD-SSI-SF in Patients with Primary Sjögren's Syndrome with Organ Involvement: Results of Qualitative Interviews and Psychometric Analyses.

Kimberly Raymond, Stephen Maher, Cory D Saucier, Meaghan O'Connor, Aaron Yarlas, Mark Kosinski, Wen-Hung Chen, Kerry Gairy

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02631538 (A Randomized, Double Blind), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02631538 phase2completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double Blind (Sponsor Open), Comparative, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Belimumab (GSK1550188) and Intravenous Rituximab Co-administration in Subjects With Primary Sjögren's Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2016 to 2020Enrolled86ConditionsSjogren's SyndromeArmsBelimumab, Rituximab, Placebo belimumab, Placebo rituximab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kimberly RaymondQualityMetric Incorporated, LLC, Johnston, RI, USA.
Stephen Maher *QualityMetric Incorporated, LLC, Johnston, RI, USA.
Cory D SaucierQualityMetric Incorporated, LLC, Johnston, RI, USA.
Meaghan O'ConnorQualityMetric Incorporated, LLC, Johnston, RI, USA.
Aaron Yarlas *QualityMetric Incorporated, LLC, Johnston, RI, USA.
Mark KosinskiQualityMetric Incorporated, LLC, Johnston, RI, USA.
Wen-Hung ChenGSK Upper Providence UP4410, 1250 South Collegeville Road, Building 4, 4th Floor, Collegeville, PA, 19426, USA. wen-hung.x.chen@gsk.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6610-9709
Kerry GairyGSK, Brentford, Middlesex, UK.

Funding

GSK 213253GSK GSK Studies 208396
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Profile of Fatigue and Discomfort-Sicca Symptoms Inventory-Short Form (PROFAD-SSI-SF) is a 19-item patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure to assess pain, fatigue, and dryness in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS). This analysis identified concepts important to measure, and evaluated the content validity and measurement properties of the PROFAD-SSI-SF, in patients with pSS.

methodsQualitative analyses (GSK Study 208396) used transcripts from an online concept elicitation (CE) discussion forum with patients with pSS and interviews with key opinion leaders (KOLs) to finalize a disease model depicting important concepts for patients with pSS. Cognitive debriefing (CD) interviews with patients with pSS were conducted to further evaluate the content validity of the PROFAD-SSI-SF. Quantitative analyses (GSK Study 213253) used post hoc analyses of blinded data from a phase 2 trial to assess PROFAD-SSI-SF measurement properties.

resultsThe CE discussion forum (N = 46) revealed dryness (oral 87.0%, ocular 73.9%, cutaneous 37.0%, vaginal 23.9%, nasal 15.2%, otic 6.5%), pain (89.1%), and fatigue (87.0%) as the most reported symptoms. KOLs (N = 5) found the concepts identified in the disease model accurate and understandable, and confirmed that PROs used in pSS studies should focus on dryness, joint pain, and fatigue. In the CD interviews (N = 20), of the 19 participants asked, all found the PROFAD-SSI-SF easy to understand, and 14/19 items were considered relevant by ≥ 18/20 participants. The quantitative analyses found an acceptable fit of the PROFAD-SSI-SF factor structure, with adequate internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity with other PRO measures, known-groups validity with Patient Global Assessment, and ability to detect change in patients with pSS.

conclusionThe final disease model confirmed that the PROFAD-SSI-SF assesses concepts that are relevant and important to patients with pSS. Our findings support the content validity and measurement properties of the PROFAD-SSI-SF as a fit-for-purpose PRO measure appropriate for use in clinical trials in patients with pSS. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER FOR THE PHASE 2 TRIAL: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02631538.

Indexed as

Autoimmune diseaseContent validityInstrument validationPatient-reported outcomesPrimary Sjogren’s syndromePROFAD-SSI-SFPsychometric propertiesQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID36227531
PMCPMC9931977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.