Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36227505›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

The cancer patients' perspective on feasibility of using a fatigue diary and the benefits on self-management: results from a longitudinal study.

Marlena Milzer, Karen Steindorf, Paul Reinke, Martina E Schmidt

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marlena MilzerDivision of Physical Activity, Prevention and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Karen SteindorfDivision of Physical Activity, Prevention and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Paul ReinkeDivision of Physical Activity, Prevention and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Martina E SchmidtDivision of Physical Activity, Prevention and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. m.schmidt@dkfz.de.
German Cancer Research Center · DEHeidelberg University · DENational Center for Tumor Diseases · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the patients' perspective on feasibility of using a fatigue diary and its benefits on self-management.

methodsThis longitudinal study enrolled 50 cancer patients in routine care. Following baseline (t0) assessment, patients were asked to complete a 7-day fatigue diary and subsequently obtained written diary evaluation. Feasibility, benefits, and fatigue-related attitudes were assessed via self-report 1 (t1) and 4 months (t2) after distributing the diary. Data were analyzed descriptively and using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.

resultsMost patients (94%) completed the diary for 7 days and rated feasibility as high. After diary completion and receiving the evaluation, fewer patients felt helpless in the face of fatigue (t1: 21% vs. t0: 53%). Additionally, more patients addressed fatigue with their general practitioner (t2: 49% vs. t0: 36%) and pro-actively searched for information and help (t2: 59% vs. t0: 38%). The diary enabled a majority of patients to be aware of their fatigue patterns, to plan daily routines accordingly and to take adequate actions against fatigue.

conclusionThe study showed that symptom monitoring via a fatigue diary was considered feasible and enhanced self-management in cancer patients. Thus, fatigue diaries might be a useful measure contributing to an improved fatigue management. The results reinforce guideline recommendations for routine application of fatigue diaries in clinical care. Healthcare professionals should encourage patients to fatigue diary use and provide individually tailored counseling based on diary entries.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsSelf-ManagementFatigueFeasibility StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesCancer-related fatigueSelf-managementSelf-monitoringSupportive careSymptom diary

Identifiers

PMID36227505
PMCPMC9559147
OpenAlexW4304990335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.