ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023
Measurement of Protein and Nucleic Acid Diffusion Coefficients Within Biomolecular Condensates Using In-Droplet Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Crowding Effects in RNA Interactions.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Lipid-Mediated Assembly of Biomolecular Condensates: Mechanisms, Regulation, and Therapeutic Implications.Biology · 2025Review
- Two Peas in a Pod: Retroviral RNA Dimers Organize Gag-RNA Nanoclusters with Novel Biophysical Properties.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Two peas in a pod: retroviral RNA dimers organize Gag-RNA nanoclusters with novel biophysical properties.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Micropipette aspiration reveals differential RNA-dependent viscoelasticity of nucleolar subcompartments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Liquid-liquid phase separation of protein and RNA complexes into biomolecular condensates has emerged as a ubiquitous phenomenon in living systems. These protein-RNA condensates are thought to be involved in many biological functions in all forms of life. One of the most sought-after properties of these condensates is their dynamical properties, as they are a major determinant of condensate physiological function and disease processes. Measurement of the diffusion dynamics of individual components in a multicomponent biomolecular condensate is therefore routinely performed. Here, we outline the experimental procedure for performing in-droplet fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) measurements to extract the diffusion coefficient of individual molecules within a biomolecular condensate in vitro. Unlike more common experiments such as fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP), where data interpretation is not straightforward and strictly model dependent, FCS offers a robust and more accurate way to quantify biomolecular diffusion rates in the dense phase. The small observation volume allows FCS experiments to report on the local diffusion coefficient within a spatial resolution of <1 μm, making it ideal for probing spatial inhomogeneities within condensates as well as variable dynamics within subcompartments of multiphasic condensates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.