ArticleInternational ophthalmology2023
A reminder about silicone oil toxicity: three cases over five years in a tertiary hospital.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unexplained vision loss following silicone oil removal: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- High resolution optical coherence tomography of intraretinal silicone oil migration after repair of fovea sparing retinal detachment.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2026Article
- Multiple imaging modalities in intraocular silicone oil emulsification and its related complications.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Prognostic Factors for Recurrent Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment after Silicone Oil Removal.Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePresumed silicone oil-related retinal toxicity causes central vision loss with a reported incidence of 1-33% in the first month after oil removal and 10% in the first six months of having silicone oil in-situ. This report examines local rates in a tertiary hospital that manages many geographically distanced patients. A miniature literature review, audit and case series are presented.
methodsA retrospective audit of all patients who underwent a 'removal of silicone oil' surgery at the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital between 2016 and 2021. Inclusion criteria were that the oil was inserted for primary or recurrent rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Visual acuity was analysed at presentation, at 1 and 3 months of oil in-situ, preoperatively to removal of oil and up to 6 months after oil removal. Ocular coherence tomographic parameters were examined at each time interval, including nerve fibre layer (NFL) and ganglion cell layer and inner plexiform layer (GCL + IPL) thicknesses in the 3 mm parafoveal zone, presence of inner retinal microcystic changes or intraretinal silicone oil globules. Patients were identified who had unexplained vision loss of two or more Snellen lines. Further analysis and case review were performed. RESULTS AND
conclusionsBetween January 2016 and May 2021, 101 patients met the inclusion criteria. Three patients had significant and unexplained visual loss. They are presented in this paper. Presumed silicone oil toxicity is an increasingly recognised and potentially devastating phenomenon that vitreo-retinal surgeons should be wary of. Patients should be specifically consented for it and hospitals should perform local auditing to determine their own rates and inform this discussion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.