Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36227356›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2023

Development of the Tracheostomy Well-Being Score in critically ill patients.

Christopher Ull, Christina Weckwerth, Uwe Hamsen, Oliver Jansen, Aileen Spieckermann, Thomas Armin Schildhauer, Robert Gaschler, Christian Waydhas

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Treatment algorithm: tracheostoma and cannula care for critically ill patients].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026
    Article
  2. Validation and reliability of the Tracheostoma Well-Being Score (TWBS) in critically ill patients.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. In the last 10 years, have our polytrauma patients become geriatric? The emergency trauma bay in the context of demographic change.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christopher Ull *Department of General and Trauma Surgery, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum (North Rhine-Westphalia), Germany. christopher.ull@rub.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5633-3179
Christina Weckwerth *Faculty of Psychology, FernUniversität of Hagen, Universitätsstraße 47, 58097, Hagen, Germany.
Uwe HamsenDepartment of General and Trauma Surgery, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum (North Rhine-Westphalia), Germany.
Oliver JansenDepartment of General and Trauma Surgery, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum (North Rhine-Westphalia), Germany.
Aileen SpieckermannDepartment of General and Trauma Surgery, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum (North Rhine-Westphalia), Germany.
Thomas Armin SchildhauerDepartment of General and Trauma Surgery, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum (North Rhine-Westphalia), Germany.
Robert GaschlerFaculty of Psychology, FernUniversität of Hagen, Universitätsstraße 47, 58097, Hagen, Germany.
Christian WaydhasDepartment of General and Trauma Surgery, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum (North Rhine-Westphalia), Germany.

Funding

Medizinische Fakultät, Ruhr-Universität Bochum K129-19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLittle attention has been given to understanding the experiences and perceptions of tracheostomized patients. This study aimed to measure the impact of tracheostomy on well-being in critically ill patients with the development of the Tracheostomy Well-Being Score (TWBS).

methodsThis is a prospective, monocentric, observational study including critically ill patients with a tracheostomy without delirium. A 25-item questionnaire with items from six categories (respiration, coughing, pain, speaking, swallowing, and comfort) was used to select the 12 best items (two per category) to form the TWBS score after testing on two consecutive days. Item selection secured (1) that there were no skewed response distributions, (2) high stability from day 1 to day 2, and (3) high prototypicality for the category in terms of item-total correlation.

resultsA total of 63 patients with a mean age of 56 years were included. The 12 items of the TWBS were characterized by a high retest reliability (τ = 0.67-0.93) and acceptable internal consistency. The overlap with the clinician rating was low, suggesting that acquiring self-report data is strongly warranted.

conclusionWith the TWBS, an instrument is available for the assessment of the subjective effects a tracheostomy has on in critically ill patients. The score potentially offers a chance to increase well-being of these patients. Additionally, this score could also increase their quality of life by improving tracheostomy and weaning management. CLINICAL

trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register Identifier DRKS00022073 (2020/06/02).

Indexed as

Critical IllnessRespiration, ArtificialHumansIntensive Care UnitsMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsTracheostomyCritical illnessIntensive care unitScoreTracheostomyVentilationWell-being

Identifiers

PMID36227356
PMCPMC10175326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.