ArticleGenetics2022
Network regression analysis for binary and ordinal categorical phenotypes in transcriptome-wide association studies.
Article in Genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Applications of gene pair methods in clinical research: advancing precision medicine.Molecular biomedicine · 2025Review
- Multiome-wide Association Studies: Novel Approaches for Understanding Diseases.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Transcriptome-wide association studies aim to integrate genome-wide association studies and expression quantitative trait loci mapping studies for exploring the gene regulatory mechanisms underlying diseases. Existing transcriptome-wide association study methods primarily focus on 1 gene at a time. However, complex diseases are seldom resulted from the abnormality of a single gene, but from the biological network involving multiple genes. In addition, binary or ordinal categorical phenotypes are commonly encountered in biomedicine. We develop a proportional odds logistic model for network regression in transcriptome-wide association study, Proportional Odds LOgistic model for NEtwork regression in Transcriptome-wide association study, to detect the association between a network and binary or ordinal categorical phenotype. Proportional Odds LOgistic model for NEtwork regression in Transcriptome-wide association study relies on 2-stage transcriptome-wide association study framework. It first adopts the distribution-robust nonparametric Dirichlet process regression model in expression quantitative trait loci study to obtain the SNP effect estimate on each gene within the network. Then, Proportional Odds LOgistic model for NEtwork regression in Transcriptome-wide association study uses pointwise mutual information to represent the general relationship among the network nodes of predicted gene expression in genome-wide association study, followed by the association analysis with all nodes and edges involved in proportional odds logistic model. A key feature of Proportional Odds LOgistic model for NEtwork regression in Transcriptome-wide association study is its ability to simultaneously identify the disease-related network nodes or edges. With extensive realistic simulations including those under various between-node correlation patterns, we show Proportional Odds LOgistic model for NEtwork regression in Transcriptome-wide association study can provide calibrated type I error control and yield higher power than other existing methods. We finally apply Proportional Odds LOgistic model for NEtwork regression in Transcriptome-wide association study to analyze bipolar and major depression status and blood pressure from UK Biobank to illustrate its benefits in real data analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.