Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36227022›Full record

Observational studyJournal of intensive care medicine2023

Comparison of Different Ultrasound Methods to Assess Changes in Muscle Mass in Critically ill Patients.

Kristina E Fuest, Hugo Lanz, Jana Schulz, Bernhard Ulm, Victoria A Bennett, Julius J Grunow, Björn Weiss, Manfred Blobner, Stefan J Schaller

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of intensive care medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kristina E FuestTechnical University of Munich, 9184School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Munich, Germany.
Hugo LanzTechnical University of Munich, 9184School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Munich, Germany.
Jana SchulzTechnical University of Munich, 9184School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Munich, Germany.
Bernhard UlmTechnical University of Munich, 9184School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Munich, Germany.
Victoria A BennettAdult Critical Care Unit, 112001Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Julius J GrunowCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Björn WeissCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Manfred BlobnerTechnical University of Munich, 9184School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Munich, Germany.
Stefan J SchallerTechnical University of Munich, 9184School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6683-9584
Technical University of Munich · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEBarts Health NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMuscle ultrasound represents a promising approach to aid diagnoses of neuromuscular diseases in critically ill patients. Unfortunately, standardization of ultrasound measurements in clinical research is lacking, making direct comparisons between studies difficult. Protocols are required to assess qualitative muscle changes during an ICU stay in patients at high risk for the development of neuromuscular acquired weakness (ICUAW).

methodsWe conducted a retrospective, observational analysis comprised of three prospective observational studies with the aim of diagnosing muscle changes by ultrasound measurement of the quadriceps muscle. Different protocols were used in each of the three studies. In total, 62 surgical, neurocritical care and trauma intensive care patients were serially assessed by different ultrasound protocols during the first week of critical illness. The relative change in ultrasound measurements was calculated for all possible locations, methods and sides. Comparison was obtained using mixed effect models with the location, the height and the side as influencing variables and patients as fixed effect. The relationship between variables and outcomes was assessed by multivariable regression analysis.

resultsUltrasound methods and measurement sites of the quadriceps muscles from all protocols were equally effective in detecting muscle changes. During the first week of an ICU stay, two groups were identified: patients with decreased muscle mass on ultrasound (n = 42) and a cohort with enlargement (n = 23). Hospital mortality was significantly increased in the cohort with muscle swelling (8 (19%) versus 12 (52%),

conclusionsDifferent approaches of ultrasound measurement during critical-illness are equally able to detect muscle changes. While some patients have a decrease in muscle mass, others show swelling, which may result in a reduced probability of surviving the hospital stay. Causative reasons for these results still remain unclear.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessIntensive Care UnitsCritical CareHumansQuadriceps MuscleRetrospective Studiescritical illnessICU-acquired weaknessoutcomesarcopeniaultrasound

Identifiers

PMID36227022
PMCPMC10154988
OpenAlexW4304957780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.