Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36227015›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2023

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in heart failure with impaired systolic function: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Ting-Yung Chang, Tze-Fan Chao, Chin-Yu Lin, Yenn-Jiang Lin, Shih-Lin Chang, Li-Wei Lo, Yu-Feng Hu, Fa-Po Chung, Shih-Ann Chen

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ting-Yung ChangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Rhythm Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Tze-Fan ChaoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Rhythm Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Chin-Yu LinDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Rhythm Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Yenn-Jiang LinDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Rhythm Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Shih-Lin ChangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Rhythm Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Li-Wei LoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Rhythm Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Yu-Feng HuDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Rhythm Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Fa-Po ChungDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Rhythm Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Shih-Ann ChenDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Rhythm Center, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWTaipei Veterans General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe recent Atrial Fibrillation Management in Congestive Heart Failure With Ablation trial did not reveal any benefit of catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), advanced heart failure (HF), and severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We hypothesized that radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) could improve outcomes in HF patients with AF and impaired left ventricular systolic function (LVEF <50%) as compared with only medical therapy.

methodsWe searched the literature for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared RFCA to medical therapy in this population.

resultsCompared with the medical therapy group, the RFCA group had significantly less all-cause mortality, HF hospitalization, and AF recurrence rates. The RFCA group had significantly higher peak oxygen consumption (VO 2max ), a better quality of life (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire score), and improved LVEF. However, RFCA for AF failed to reduce all-cause mortality in a specific meta-analysis of four RCTs that enrolled patients with LVEF ≤35%.

conclusionCompared with medical therapy, RFCA for AF in the setting of HF with impaired systolic function is associated with better clinical (HF hospitalization and all-cause mortality), structural (LVEF improvement), functional (VO 2max ), and quality of life outcomes. However, RFCA for AF failed to reduce all-cause mortality in RCTs that enrolled patients with LVEF ≤35% and thereby indicated the necessary stratification to identify patients who may benefit more from RFCA.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationHeart FailureHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStroke VolumeTreatment OutcomeVentricular Function, Left

Identifiers

PMID36227015
PMCPMC12755498
OpenAlexW4304975959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.